Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: solid chain tensioners or Pressure fed??

  1. #21
    t150r
    Guest
    Heirplane, You should show some respect for me son, if that donkey hadn't beat me up the stairs, I could be your daddy.

  2. #22
    mwalker09
    Guest
    Damn Roland, your a encyclopedia of chain tensioner info...thanks

  3. #23
    pwd72s
    Guest

    I smell one rat posing as two...or more

    t150r....tabs52. Amazing how the BS reads the same, isn't it?

  4. #24
    heirplane
    Guest

    Solid chain tensioners or pressure fed?

    One would think that a person who was accepted to MIT would know that respect is earned. So far, any evidence produced by you to support a position of respect has been woefully inadequate.
    It would you who initiated the comments directed at you by your grossly inappropriate remarks directed at the members of this site, generally.
    Apparently, your knowledge base is limited to bus scheduling given your notions regarding interspecies reproduction.

  5. #25
    911SRegistry
    Guest

    Re: Solid chain tensioners or pressure fed?

    Uhh, I guess the above has something to do with chain tensioners.

    BTW, if anybody wants to try some mechanical tensioners, I have a pair for $20.

    Sherwood

  6. #26
    Roland Kunz
    Guest

    Re: Solid chain tensioners or pressure fed?

    Hello

    I was just searching what is on the net, so I don´t have to write all over.

    My friend was at the MIT at Boston. He lives in Houston wich has a modern Bus system. But I think he had nothing to do with that ( Wouln´t surprise me on the other side ).
    But one from his collegue became a high number in DOT witch helped him to import some real interessting cars to the staates.

    He modified them to US standards and used the MIT to caculate and aprove the door reinforcements and other stuff.

    The last time we met he runed John Brown engenieering in Tokio and suroundings ( Asia, Philipines & Australis ).

    Geting a job is quite easy for him, if something does interfer his control they have to find an other expert. Well I wish I had the same references ....... and he never uses them to direct. They just give confidence.

    I´m just a simple worker and only my work can prove my competence and abiltis.

    Grüsse

  7. #27
    pwd72s
    Guest

    Just a simple worker?????

    Roland, I've read your input on this and other boards. If you are a "simple" worker, the Wright brothers were bicycle repairmen....IMHO. Keep up the excellent input, and thanks! Paul

  8. #28
    Smadman
    Guest
    My $0.02...

    Roland, please keep posting. Your information is facinating for those of us just familiarising ourselves with the intracacies of the flat 6.

    Given the earlier snipe (and lack of proper retaction) it is quite clear to those who enjoy taking their own time to help others on this board that you must be trying to compensate for something.

    You wrote a paper...oooooo. Now that we have established that, perhaps you would take the time to notice that there are a large number of people with a wide variety of backgrounds, educations, and most importantly experiences (especially with 911's) who collectively hold a treasure-trove of information. I'm sure your knowledge of urban transportation systems has no equal, however, I don't see how that has any bearing or relevance to chain tensioners for antique Porsches.


    Regards ;

    Mark ****inson (an iron ringer)
    Calgary, Alberta

  9. #29
    911SRegistry
    Guest

    Tensioners

    Smadman,
    I assume your comments wrere directed to T150R and not to someone else.

    Roland. I enjoy your comments and opinions. Most of us here to learn and share experiences. Unfortunately, not all of us are.

    Early 911S Registry web

  10. #30
    Smadman
    Guest
    Yes, sorry...that wasn't clear. My observations were quite definitely directed towards t150r.

    Appologies to all others.

    It is interesting that t150r will not place his/her name beside his/her comments. Somehow that lack of responsibility lends itself towards a lack of credibility. I wonder who the first person to sign that 'paper' was?

    Mark ****inson

Similar Threads

  1. FS: NOS chain tensioners
    By Rick Cabell in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-16-2014, 02:53 PM
  2. Need help, chain tensioners
    By Norm01 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-07-2014, 07:58 AM
  3. 930 or Carrera Chain Tensioners???
    By 4SFED in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-10-2013, 10:47 PM
  4. WTB: solid chain tensioners; collars?
    By project66 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 05:04 AM
  5. F/S OE Chain Tensioners & Spacers
    By Bobby Smith in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 12:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.