Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Should I have two battery boxes?

  1. #11
    Oil coolers were an option on the '73-S. I've not heard of one having a factory cooler unless it came with factory air conditioning.

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  2. #12

    battery boxes

    I also have a 72 T , I am restoring right now.
    ANd I have the two battey boxes and the factory A.C.
    But the AC does not work right now so it is out.
    I would like to go with one battery and put it in the A.C.box
    or the right battey box.

    1. want kind of battery can I use
    a.(amps ,specs)
    b. best place to get one
    2. Were is the best place to mount it?
    1972 911t Coupe(being Restored)
    1973 911t Targa(parts Car)
    2001 Audi A4 Quattro
    2004 Ford F150

  3. #13
    Originally posted by Porsche Rescue
    Thanks for the reference diagram pwd72s. Sounds like the only modification on my car is removal of the right battery box. Wonder why anyone would go to the trouble/expense?
    Just guessing here...but possibly the original rotted out due to acid splash...and a previous owner decided it was easier to plug the hole, and go to a single battery?
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

  4. #14
    I think that is a good guess. If true, I suspect the left one was replaced for the same reason because it looks too good to have had a battery on it for 32 years. I need to look at both sides a little more closely.

  5. #15

    Dr. Johnson says . . . .

    I never knew that the Porsches had two battery boxes till I saw it in my newly purchased Johnson's book.

    Why did Porsche need two batteries in the early 70's? Do people still put two batteries in their cars when they restore them?

    larry
    Early 911S Registry Member #537

    73 - Viper Green 911E Targa - Kermit - Gone but not forgotten

    Kermit's Short Story and Pix on the 911E Website

    06 - Lexus IS250 MT6
    98 - Volvo 70V XC

  6. #16
    My understanding is that it was for weight balance, side to side.
    The swb cars had only one battery. They also had weights inserted behind the front bumper on each side to help front/ rear weight balance. Battery change was made in '69 with longer wheel base and weights were eliminated.
    A proper concours restoration would require two correct batteries in '69-73 cars.

  7. #17
    Larry, the way I understand it, Porsche went to the twin battery boxes as a weight distribution thing. Heck, early in the 911 run, they actually placed pig iron weights in the front bumper! I still run the twin batteries, only now they are gel cells in the exact same size as originals, made by sonnenschein, a german battery maker. However, many have gone to optima, stinger, etc. in a single battery set-up. A search on either here or Pelican should yield tons of info. Twin batteries were standard from '69 thru '73, if memory serves...
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

Similar Threads

  1. Bolts near battery boxes
    By denson in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-23-2014, 06:43 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-16-2013, 12:23 PM
  3. 72 911 ST battery boxes ?
    By manu72S in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 09:37 AM
  4. Brand new battery boxes OE
    By Longballa in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-18-2010, 10:36 AM
  5. FS: Battery Boxes 69-73 NOS
    By jhora in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-22-2009, 07:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.