Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: So what is it ? (engine question)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,926

    So what is it ? (engine question)

    My car is a 67 normal with a 901/05 engine with increased displacement to 2.2 liters.
    The records are not clear as to what type pistons, heads were used. I assume the cams are the originals - the distributer is #0231 159 002.
    I notice I am listed in the latest Esses as a 67 T.
    From B.A.'s Perf. Handbook I realize that increasing the disp. will lower the compression ratio.
    A 2.2 T with a compression ratio of 8.6 :1 has 125 hp. Does that mean my engine with 2.2 liters has less power than the stock 2.0 ?
    If so - what are the advantages of the increase ?

    I plan on getting a dyno in the spring ( new seats and rear shocks come first)
    But am curious to know what I might have now.

    Is this answerable on the info I have given?

    Thanks
    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  2. #2
    John,
    All other things being equal, increasing displacement usually increases torque and horsepower. Not knowing what pieces you have in your engine makes it difficult to know the approx. power range. The main variables for a higher compression ratio include:

    - larger bore
    - larger stroke
    - smaller combustion chamber volume
    - higher dome on piston top

    A big factor in engine power is how much air can pass through it. This is a function of the valve timing; namely how long and how far the camshaft opens the valves as well as valve and port size. An S camshaft keeps the valves open longer and opens them further to allow more air (and fuel) to enter the combustion chambers. A factory 2 liter S engine should be in the area of 170-180 hp.

    Hope this helps,
    Sherwood

  3. #3
    Another key factor in producing power is to keep the cylinder pressure that the engine sees while running as high as possible; this is a function of the static compression ratio and camshaft timing. A standard cranking compression test is a good reality check for the proper piston and cam combo. Here are some examples: 1) A stock 72T with 7.5:1 CR will crank 150 PSI! How? By not keeping the intake valve open too long and blowing down the cylinder. 2) My jet boat with an 8.5:1 455 Olds wouldn't rev over 3800 RPM, and took its sweet time getting there, until I installed a smaller cam designed to work with the low CR. This little change netted me about 80 HP, and it now gets to 4500 RPM almost immediately.

    As previously mentioned, getting more air in and out (improving volumetric efficiency) is the recipe to increasing RPM and HP, but it must be backed up with a high CR, or you will have a very unhappy engine.
    Leaf green 72T, SOLD!
    Gone back to my MoPar roots!

  4. #4
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,926
    Thanks guys;

    The 901/01 (and 901/05) cams have the same valve timing as the 70/71 901/09 911 E - So shouldn't the comp ratio be the same 9.1:1 ? or is it reduced by 4/10ths of a point ?
    Would it be a "67 something between a T and an E " ?
    I notice the 67/68 901/30 rally engine had, along with 46 ida's and S cams (and certainly higher comp pistons ) it had valve and port openings the same as for the 911 normal.
    My comp test came back all in the 170's - bad idea to change just the cam grind ? would that make an unhappy engine ?

    Thanks again
    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  5. #5
    Took me a while to figure it out...in the esses, T means Targa, C means coupe.
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

  6. #6
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,926
    Except it's not a targa. Also it is listed as
    67 T (c)

    Which is cool - if thats what she is. But what is she ?



    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

Similar Threads

  1. engine question
    By andrea70 in forum General Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-28-2009, 10:26 AM
  2. a '68 engine question
    By 911quest in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-06-2009, 04:58 AM
  3. Engine # Question
    By matt911 in forum General Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-17-2008, 10:36 PM
  4. Engine # and VIN# question
    By EuroSC in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 06:23 PM
  5. Engine nr. question
    By DannyK in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-10-2004, 03:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.