Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Redline for 2.4 S

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Posts
    210

    Redline for 2.4 S

    What all does everyone use for a max. rpm for the 72-73 cars? Do you stick to the recommendation of 7300 or ...?

    Since you can remove the rev limiter or modify it, what is a safe engine speed? Among other things, the connecting rods are 60 grams lighter than those in the 2.2 S's. When does valve / piston interference become a problem?

    I think I remember reading somewhere that a piston speed of 2500 feet per minute is a max?
    Early 911S Registry #224
    911S Targa 1973
    356B Roadster 1962

  2. #2

    Rev limits

    I stick to 7,300 on my MFI 2.4S. The rotor button limiter works very well. Of course the tacho may well be out somewhat.......... Must check that one day. My mechanic tells me it wont pop at those revs so I am happy to leave well enough alone.
    Rgds
    Simon

  3. #3
    [QUOTE=Edwin Ek]

    Since you can remove the rev limiter or modify it, what is a safe engine speed? Among other things, the connecting rods are 60 grams lighter than those in the 2.2 S's. When does valve / piston interference become a problem?


    Hey, try 8, then 8,500, then 9. Let us know what you find out, okay?
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

  4. #4
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,461
    Ed,

    I use my stock 7300-S rotor for my new 2.7 rebuild...

    You say modify the rotor... how so?
    I understand the concept, just put in a 'slightly' stronger spring...

    However, who does the trail and error? ... I would imagine it could be done on a distributor machine.

    I have not heard of anyone routinely doing this...

    What I have heard is... Changing to a contemporary CD-Box with a infinitely controlled cutout.

    If you do know of someone who does modify the stock 7300 S rotor please let me know... I think the old blue car would be just fine at about 7800...

    Cheers,
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  5. #5
    Using a distributor machine would be handy, but you'd have to rig a working ignition system to output enough secondary voltage via a coil and through the rotor and spark plug to observe the cutout speed.

    As a project in school, I once made a copy of a SnapOn ignition system simulator. With an electric motor and rheostat, I could spin the distributor (Chevy V8) to any speed and watch the spark plugs fire. At 6000 rpm, the spark at each plug pretty much looks continuous - mesmorizing as well.

    A spring in the rotor, it being a mechanical component, may not be all that consistent from unit to unit (don't know), whereas an electronic ignition box may be more accurate in limiting spark. The Crane boxes are supposedly variable with a rotary wheel while the MSD units use preset "rpm pills" to set the ignition cutout limit.

    Sherwood

  6. #6
    Goldmember ttweed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    La Jolla, CA
    Posts
    1,429
    Personally, I would not spin it past 7,300 without racing valve springs and retainers and Carillo, Pauter or factory titanium rods. Why would you want to anyway, since without a race cam, you are already past your peak power and torque at that point??? Just shift it and you'll be back in the sweet part of the curve. Maybe with a 906 cam you would benefit from revving to 8K+.

    I use an MSD 6AL in my 2.0S with a 7,000 limit "pill" and I rarely miss having that extra 300 RPMs. I figure it provides a little safety margin anyway and helps with engine longevity. Most of the high RPM racing engines are "40-hour motors."

    My '73 has a 3.4l with Carillo rods and Aase springs, but the cam peaks at 6800 RPM so I rarely run it above 7K either.

    TT
    Tom Tweed
    Early S Registry #257
    R Gruppe #232
    Rennlist Founding Member #990416-1164
    PCA National DE Instructor
    Read my surf novel!

  7. #7
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,461
    Very good info and practical advice Tom...

    Cheers,
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  8. #8
    Right Tom and Chuck,

    On the 2.7 engine that Tom Woodford built for me I set the Crane 800 rpm below what Tom said the engine could safely turn. There were a few spots on differant tracks where I'd have been happier if I had just a bit more head room but I learned to change the line or the shift point and got along fine and I was always comfortable running the motor to the rev limiter either on purpose or accidentially.
    Ed Barnett
    RGruppe #124
    Northern California Racing Club
    American Racing Club
    Member, Northwest Hillclimb Association

  9. #9
    Tom's advice is sound. I figure that Porsche installed the rev limiters for a reason.
    Paul D. Early S Registry #8 - Cyclops Minister of West Coast Affairs
    "Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have the radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. 1973)

  10. #10
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,461
    ... And as before the rebuild, I'm again run'n my car in the 'Short Track Series' on 'the Streets of Willow' ... AND touching the 7300 limiter at lest twice a lap, every lap, with the confidence that 'everything will stay happy'

    So there-ya-go
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

Similar Threads

  1. Swepco/Redline Fuel Treatment for MFI
    By 50/50 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-06-2013, 07:27 PM
  2. Redline Restorations Open House
    By setho in forum Other Car Cultures
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-28-2013, 03:02 PM
  3. FS: 70-73 911S,RS 7200 Redline Tach
    By eprnjp in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 12:19 PM
  4. WTB: 71 tach 6300 redline
    By Zithlord in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-28-2007, 03:09 AM
  5. any opinions on porsche planet/redline service
    By karlusmagnus in forum General Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2006, 07:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.