Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: spectacular 911R spread in Magazine

  1. #21
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,925
    No one wants to touch this one - so Bob, how many did you discover in your research to build that beautiful R you have - 3 or 4 ?


    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  2. #22
    i'll stick my neck out and say "whatever andy says". who else has taken that many pics of 2 of the prototypes. who else has probably had hours of conversations with the people who have restored the prototypes. who else has provided rare parts for these cars. although i have not personally asked andy but my guess is that the crew that restored the 2 prototypes had andy's phone number on their speed dial. seriously i could go on about andy's in-depth knowledge of the R.
    _B
    Sent from a pay phone

    888888 eL, Oph'eL'ia

    Instagram: werk_crew
    www.werkcrew.com
    www.werkcrew.tumblr.com
    www.handofwinter.tumblr.com

  3. #23
    oh yeah - forgot to ask what's "FNG's"? i'm hip, i'm young (sort of at 35), what does this mean?
    _B
    Sent from a pay phone

    888888 eL, Oph'eL'ia

    Instagram: werk_crew
    www.werkcrew.com
    www.werkcrew.tumblr.com
    www.handofwinter.tumblr.com

  4. #24
    Defender of the Normal John Fusco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,925
    I do not mean to cast any doubts on what Andy said, or what was written in that article, I know very little about R's or any of these cars for that matter.
    I'm just an F 'n N ew G uy.
    I am only trying to find out why it is that Ludvigsen would say that the Porsche records (which I assume he saw) say 3 and Andy and GT Porsche mag say 4 .

    John

    Du must schwein haben

    901/05 #305701

    Bultaco Metralla 62 M8
    1968 BMW R69S

    Early911SReg #606

  5. #25
    That's a valid question John...and I'm sure that somehow the correct answer will surface.
    Paul Schooley
    71 911T (RS wanabe w/2.7L juice)
    S Reg #863
    R Gruppe #330

  6. #26
    Rennsport
    Guest
    There are four protoypes:

    1. 305876S Hellelfenbein
    2. 306681S Feurrot
    3. 307671S Blutorange
    4. 307670S Zitronengelb

    Source Weissach (and other)

    btw, my familyname is Ludvigsen, but we`re not related

  7. #27
    It usually takes a extra month or two for the english mags to get here. Is the Febuary GT Purely Porsche here in the states on the newstand?
    Here is a question I have never seen answered.
    It is known that Karl Baur Co. built the 911R for Porsche. Who built the 4, prototypes? Porsche or K. Baur Co. ?

  8. #28
    One more question......Did Baur receive production 911 bodies and they built the rest? Or did Porsche do the body work, ( welding on flares), and supply them with all the pieces to be assembled?

  9. #29
    Righteous Indignation 70SATMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    4,152
    Feb GT hit the shelves at Barnes/Noble on the 18th of this month. I picked one up in San Jose.

    It's getting expensive.. GT, Octane, 911/Pworld, Classic Sports Car......
    Michael
    “Electricity is really just organized lightning”

    -Dusty 70S Coupe
    -S Registry #586

  10. #30
    If there really were 4, has anyone contacted (the other) Ludvigsen so it can be corrected in the 3rd edition?

    It seems odd that he would have gotten it wrong twice.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 04:49 PM
  2. LWB Horn Grills Spectacular
    By BBausser in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-26-2010, 12:10 PM
  3. Unique and spectacular 912!!
    By mjk911 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 08:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.