Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 46

Thread: Corvairs

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Corvairs

    Does anyone here likes Corvairs?
    I think the Corvairs beat Porsche to the mmarket with a air cooled flat 6.
    (please no flaming )

  2. #2
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,475
    Sure.........

    I like mine like this...........
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  3. #3
    There are many good things about Corvairs.

    But, there are many great things about 911's!

    After owning a 65 Corvair Corsa for 10 years it took about 3 months of owning a 1968 911T to decide that the Corsa was to go. Yes a 68T!

    Compaired to everything else that Detroit was producing the Corvair was an excellent car. Sporty, efficient, durable, and clean esthetics. Pretty daring for Chevrollet. The Corvair could out handle virtually every domestic car so to call it unsafe or dangerous was strange. It handled "differently" would be more correct.

    In a land of V8's the Corvair did pretty well.

    If Chevrollet wants to get me into their showroom a Retro Corvair just might do it.

    Hmmm...
    1970 911S Targa
    On the road again soon.

  4. #4
    I inherited a '62 Monza from my sister. Converted the Powerglide to 4-speed manual, upped displacement to 164 cu. in (~2.7 liters), added the riguer 4 downdraft 1 barrels, lowered with widened 13x7"wheels on Goodyear Blue Streak Caldwell recaps. That was my ride for along time with an occassional autocross. I finally sold it for my '69 pcar (that's a ways back).

    GM showed typical cajones by dropping it under pressure by this guy who didn't/still doesn't have a driver's license, but wrote a book about it (a person I respect in other areas, though). Actually, GM marketed this car in the "sporty" category, yet as set up, was anything but that. They stopped short of giving it a real independent suspension, instead equipping it with a variation of a VW swing axle. They were also troubled by oil leaks. Otherwise, a forward-thinking, nice-looking, light and maneuverable compact of the day. It's a good thing the aftermarket stepped up to provide the right parts that GM "forgot".

    The Yenko Stinger in Chuck's post was the epitomy of Corvair development - of course not created by GM.

    Sherwood

  5. #5
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,475
    Unfortunately I don't have a picture, but here in SoCal there's an absolutly beautiful early Corvair spider with a personalize plate that reads ..........

    F NADER

    My buddy Hector's mom's gold early coupe/automatic was the first car I ever spun out...

    I thought it was a very fun and practical 'small' American car that lacked from bad press and bastard-child development.
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  6. #6
    Jared Rundell - Registered User JCR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Birmingham, MI
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Miller
    F NADER
    LOL Chuck - I'm sure nobody here voted for that NUT!

    I've never owned or driven a Corviar. But years ago (early '90s), I was working in the Cadillac studio at GM Design Center. Every so often we had a "studio cleanup" day... usually before some celebrity or political dignitary came through for a tour. Is I walked over to deposit my armload of botched/rejected sketches on the big trash pile that had formed in the middle of the studio - I saw something that I couldn't BELIEVE was sitting on top of that pile!

    An ORIGINAL Corvair rendering/design proposal dated early 1963 - beautiful "old school" technique, gold chalk and gouache on black Canson paper. It was created and signed by designer Dave Hronek (who had since retired from the General, so I never knew him). Let's just say, I quickly removed it from that trashpile!

    I'll see if I can get a picture, it is now properly framed and on display (so reflections may be tricky) - SO glad I saved it from the SHREDDER!
    Jared
    '73 911S #0793
    '69 912_ #0602
    Early S #0454
    RGruppe #0391

  7. #7
    I a fan of the early cars up to '64.
    I like the '64 since it has the early style but the later car's suspension.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by JCR
    I saw something that I couldn't BELIEVE was sitting on top of that pile!

    An ORIGINAL Corvair rendering/design proposal dated early 1963 - beautiful "old school" technique, gold chalk and gouache on black Canson paper. - SO glad I saved it from the SHREDDER!
    Jared:

    Just goes to show -- One man's trash is another man's treasure. That is why Judy and I like antiquing. But that's something that you already know.



    larry
    Early 911S Registry Member #537

    73 - Viper Green 911E Targa - Kermit - Gone but not forgotten

    Kermit's Short Story and Pix on the 911E Website

    06 - Lexus IS250 MT6
    98 - Volvo 70V XC

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,098
    As an aside. In my day job, I deal with engineering drawings. Now that they are produced by AutoCAD (or other CAD programs), I can no longer tell which CAD operator (not a draftsman) or often which firm produced the document.

    I truly miss the old hand drawn drawings where each draftman was idiosyncratic and you could spot both the "style" of the firm which produced the drawing and the hand of the guy who actually put india ink to linen (or is it pencil to mylar?). Many of these drawings are art in their own right.

    It is a shame to see this human touch go away.


    Quote Originally Posted by JCR
    LOL Chuck - I'm sure nobody here voted for that NUT!

    I've never owned or driven a Corviar. But years ago (early '90s), I was working in the Cadillac studio at GM Design Center. Every so often we had a "studio cleanup" day... usually before some celebrity or political dignitary came through for a tour. Is I walked over to deposit my armload of botched/rejected sketches on the big trash pile that had formed in the middle of the studio - I saw something that I couldn't BELIEVE was sitting on top of that pile!

    An ORIGINAL Corvair rendering/design proposal dated early 1963 - beautiful "old school" technique, gold chalk and gouache on black Canson paper. It was created and signed by designer Dave Hronek (who had since retired from the General, so I never knew him). Let's just say, I quickly removed it from that trashpile!

    I'll see if I can get a picture, it is now properly framed and on display (so reflections may be tricky) - SO glad I saved it from the SHREDDER!
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  10. #10
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by scargo70
    I think the Corvairs beat Porsche to the market with a air cooled flat 6.
    Yes, but so did Preston Tucker in the late 1940s (Tuckers had a modified Franklin airplane engine).

    Corvairs are kind of neat, and a Corvair Turbo costs a lot less than a 930.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

Similar Threads

  1. . . . And Speaking of Corvairs . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Other Car Cultures
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-12-2011, 07:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.