Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: 1968 Porsche 911 coupe

  1. #11
    The figures in the Ward's book show gas mileage at 15.9 mpg. Not very impressive. Is this typical for a '68? I recall getting better mileage, at least on the highway, with my long gone '66, which had more radical cams.
    Tom F.
    Long Beach, CA

  2. #12
    My 68S has no side marker lights
    If it's an S, it was not a US deliverey car, and only US cars had them, my 68S doesn't have them and never did.

    1) Wrong decklid - that one belongs on a 1965 - early 1967 car.
    The decklid changed in the middle of 68, so it could be correct, my current 68 has the newer type, but I would say most 68's have the older type.

    The figures in the Ward's book show gas mileage at 15.9 mpg. Not very impressive
    I've necer actually calculated my mpg, but in my '68 they're lousy for sure.

    Very nice car, $60,000 however.....mmmmm
    Henry

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Suffolk, VA
    Posts
    380
    Thanks Henry,

    Not so sure about the year for the change in the decklid. My understanding is that it was midyear 1967, not 1968. Here are the cars I've had and the associated decklids:
    1966 911 - Old style (with black under the grille)
    1966 912 - Old style (with black under the grille)
    1967 911 - New style (901/05 engine and green gauges - ie - early 67)
    1967 911 - New style (901/05 engine and green gauges - ie - early 67))
    1968 912 - New style
    1968 911 - New style
    1970 911E - New style
    1970 911S - New style
    1972 911T - New style

    I'll check Johnson's book when I get a chance to see what he says.
    1970 911S Coupe (Burgundrot) (sold)
    1967 911 Coupe (Light Ivory) (mostly gone)
    1966 911 Coupe (Sand Beige) (sold)
    Van Diemen RF99 Formula Continental
    Citation F1000 on the way
    Van Diemen Hayabusa SCCA Formula S (sale pending)
    Other Early 911/912/914

  4. #14
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    Nice car....

    it's $39,500 on their site

    www.motoringinvestments.com

    e

  5. #15
    Nice car indeed. The side reflectors came on all '68 models, US only, to comply with safety regulations. Porsche incorporated reflectors in the '69 taillight re-design so they weren't necessary.

    In '68 you could get a "base" 911 or a 911L in the USA, both with the same smog engine, but the L had S trim. T,L, and S were available elsewhere.

  6. #16
    Cute car, although the painter got wild with the overspray. Is that a Bursch muffler?

    MPG??? Who cares? I mean, REALLY? Who cares? If it got 10mpg I'd still be happy to be seen in it.

    Best,

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  7. #17
    Why the plastic dash pad cover on such a nice car?
    Chris

  8. #18
    I like the S for sale at the same place with the $100grand resto
    Early 911S Registry #750
    1970 911E - The Good Stuff
    2001 Toyota Landcruiser

  9. #19
    Yeah! That 73' S is flawless!

    Erick

  10. #20
    Sold at $35,000
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

Similar Threads

  1. FS: @Bonhams Paris - 1968 Porsche 911 T 2 Litres Coupé
    By 67er911S in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-06-2014, 05:34 PM
  2. FS: @ebay - 1968 Porsche 911L Coupe
    By 67er911S in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 04:11 AM
  3. FS: @Bonhams 1968 Porsche 911S Coupe
    By 67er911S in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-19-2013, 06:18 PM
  4. 1968 Porsche 911 Coupe
    By 72targa in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 10:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.