Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Wevo PSJ - Buy it, buy it NOW!!!

  1. #1

    Talking Wevo PSJ - Buy it, buy it NOW!!!

    I installed my Wevo Precision Shifting Joint last night. I bought it on a recommendation promising divine rebirth of my shifting response; I decided to take the jump, even though my hopes weren't high. If the Rennshifter was the best $500 I have spent on my car, the joint is the best $200 I have spent on the car.

    My God. The thing shifts so much better: better engagement, smoother gear transitions, etc. I will say that DILIGENT adjustment of the joint is necessary, but once you have it, it is shocking.

    I thought my stock joint was in decent shape. Once I got it off, I realized how crappy a design it really is in comparison. Even if you have a perfect factory unit, it can't compare. Drop the cash, buy the joint and be happy.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  2. #2
    Did noise/vibration/harshness increase?

  3. #3
    Does this joint have an axial degree of freedom that the OEM ones do?

    Curious about the design and how it accounts for flexing the chassis and flex of the drive train on stock rubber mounts.

    I have viewed this product as one best for race stiffened chassis and running solid mounts. Would like to know if I am wrong on this.
    1970 911S Targa
    On the road again soon.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by 37yrold911
    Did noise/vibration/harshness increase?
    Not a bit.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by bobmagyar
    Does this joint have an axial degree of freedom that the OEM ones do?

    Curious about the design and how it accounts for flexing the chassis and flex of the drive train on stock rubber mounts.

    I have viewed this product as one best for race stiffened chassis and running solid mounts. Would like to know if I am wrong on this.
    It has a better range of motion than the stock unit. The stock unit is garbage compared to the Wevo unit. It is like comparing wood wheels to forged aluminum wheels.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  6. #6
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780
    Great. One more thing to add to the 'to do' list.

  7. #7
    Kenik,

    When can i take it for a spin to check it out?

    Brooke
    Brooke
    1969 911 ST w/ 2.8SS
    1973 911 RS tribute with 3.3 turbo
    1970 914-6 w/ 2.2S (sold)
    1972 BMW M2 (sold)
    R Gruppe #338
    S Reg # 855

  8. #8
    K

    Does your post imply that you have installed both the Rennshift II and now the Wevo joint? I have yet to install my Rennshifter. It sits quietly in the garage. Did you notice a big difference going to the RS II and now an even bigger difference going to the Wevo joint?

    Inquiring minds need to know. Thanks man.

    CT
    2004 GT3 Carrara White with a few mods...
    2011 987.2 Spyder White, LWB's, 6 speed... Crazy Fun!!!

    R #208
    S #607
    A #76

  9. #9
    Brooke; anytime you decide to stop by after work.

    Chris; I absolutely noticed a difference.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

Similar Threads

  1. FS: WEVO 901 Shifter
    By Mr9146 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-24-2012, 06:51 AM
  2. 901: Wevo or Rennshift
    By v-8 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 06:17 PM
  3. Wevo G50 mount
    By boba in forum General Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2007, 06:21 PM
  4. wevo products
    By RPMClassic in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-01-2006, 10:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.