Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: pre-73 first post

  1. #1
    Member A_Alfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Spain / Germany
    Posts
    95

    pre-73 first post

    Well, this is my first Post on this board that I luckily found 3-4 months ago.

    I am new to the pre-73 world but not to the Porsche world (993 & 986S).

    I am looking since 10 months to buy a pre 73 911 model that I will use for weekend fun, and also for regularity rallyes and regularity in circuit 3-4 times per year. So I am looking for pre73 looks inside out but slightly enhanced performance not a complete garage queen

    The things that I have clear by now, is that I want a coupe (sunroof will be nice to have) and that I cannot afford an S at current prices

    Last weeked tested my first 2 pre 73s, they were 2 2.4T models, one 72 modified (brakes, motor (injection) and suspension) and one 73 unmodified, and I really liked the concept is just what I expected, specially the modified one, the other although I did like it needed some serious attention.

    After the test the first question raised to my mind , for which I would like to obtain your opinion if possible.

    Is the 2.4 E significantly more DIY friendly than the T?, I enjoy DIY a lot as part of the fun owning this cars.

    Is its worth that I wait for a nice 2.4E or you can obtain similar performance from a tunned 2.4T engine?

    Are the trim parts of the pre-73s car difficult or expensive to obtain?

    What are good sources to find nice not very expensive pre 73 cars?

    Thanks and sorry for so many questions in my first post.
    Early S Reg. #1263
    72´911E
    95´993
    02´986S

  2. #2
    1. Is the 2.4 E significantly more DIY friendly than the T?

    As far as I know, the 2.4T and 2.4E motors are equally DIY friendly.

    2. Is its worth that I wait for a nice 2.4E or you can obtain similar performance from a tunned 2.4T engine?

    You can put E or S cams/parts into a T and have similar performance. I recommend keeping a 911E or a 911S P-car stock to retain their value.

    3. Are the trim parts of the pre-73s car difficult or expensive to obtain?

    Expensive- yes; difficult to obtain- no.

    4. What are good sources to find nice not very expensive pre 73 cars?

    There are lots including this site. I like Pelicanparts' forums (forums.pelicanparts.com) and their parts site will give you an idea of how much $$$$ new parts cost. Rennlist (forums.rennlist.org) is more 993s and 996s but also has ads for longhoods. Keep an eye out for local ads as that is where good P-cars can be found.

  3. #3
    What are good sources to find nice not very expensive pre 73 cars?
    Check with your local Porsche club.

    Visit some independent repair shops and ask if they have customers interested in selling.

    Cruise neighborhoods during the weekend when people have their garage doors open. Who knows what lurks under that dusty car cover in the side yard.

    Autotrader

    Craigslist

    ... there is nothing good on EBay (The Devil's Swapmeet)
    Torsion Bar Impaired... again.

  4. #4
    The 73 T has CIS injection and the 73 E is MFI. The CIS should be less maintenence but the MFI may offer more performance. That said however I've never had many maintenence issues with the MFI and carb setups that I've had in the past, just an adjustment here and there.

    Modified cars are fun but I perfer mostly period correct modifications. I've had a 69S, 72T modified to RS specs and my current 73T. If your just driving around town I really like my 73 CIS and would recommend it highly, if your wanting some track time stick with the "E" MFI or carbs and modify/update the suspension. Brakes on the E are the same as the S. My two cents worth....
    Mike
    S Registry #825
    73.5 Dalmatian Blue

  5. #5
    Righteous Indignation 70SATMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    4,152
    WELCOME!

    Early 2.4T had MFI until 73.5T then switched to CIS. (talking US Spec here)MFI E to MFI T no difference in DIY. Go with the E or tune a T to E spec.

    Or find any old 69-73 with a nasty 3.2 dropped in.
    Michael
    “Electricity is really just organized lightning”

    -Dusty 70S Coupe
    -S Registry #586

  6. #6
    Blessed be the lowered RickS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Worshington State
    Posts
    1,360
    If you like the 'long-hood' look and weight savings, I wouldn't eliminate the 73s because of the fat rubber baby bumpers (overriders). Those can be easily removed and swapped for earlier models. Considering scarcity, you should probably consider them.

    Not trying to insult you, but the longhoods ended in '73 and the horizontal smiles (impact bumpers) began in '74.

    Happy hunting and keep us informed.
    71 914 3.0, 82 SC, ESR 376, RG 307

    "The problem with the world is, the ignorant are cock-sure and the intelligent are full of doubt." Bertram Russell

  7. #7

    911

    a alfa,
    i sent you a pm.

  8. #8
    Member A_Alfa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Spain / Germany
    Posts
    95
    Thanks for the very usefull information, really appreciated.

    I will be around this great board. Thanks again.
    Early S Reg. #1263
    72´911E
    95´993
    02´986S

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by RickS
    If you like the 'long-hood' look and weight savings, I wouldn't eliminate the 73s because of the fat rubber baby bumpers (overriders). Those can be easily removed and swapped for earlier models. Considering scarcity, you should probably consider them.

    Not trying to insult you, but the longhoods ended in '73 and the horizontal smiles (impact bumpers) began in '74.

    Happy hunting and keep us informed.
    Alfa A:

    Don't let these guys get your head in an uproar about the rubber baby bumpers. Just like the oil tank position on the 72's, it is the bumpers that truly and easily separate the 73's from the rest of the early cars.

    I will admit that while my car was getting restored, I agonized about putting the bumpers on, and got plenty of flack from the crowd who suggested (some rather strongly) that I leave them off. Well, they are on, and I am not unhappy with my decision.

    But each car is individual to the owner. Just don't exclude the 73's. They have the same engine and tranny as the 72's. Here are a few pix of Kermit with the bumpers clearly shown. They were taken last week at the Concours here in Chicago. I won my class (C) - I was very excited - against 7 other cars.

    larry
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Early 911S Registry Member #537

    73 - Viper Green 911E Targa - Kermit - Gone but not forgotten

    Kermit's Short Story and Pix on the 911E Website

    06 - Lexus IS250 MT6
    98 - Volvo 70V XC

  10. #10
    Nice car Larry. Great color.

    I love my new 71 E over my old "T" for sure.....Leon

Similar Threads

  1. Not sure where to post this one...
    By John Fusco in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-18-2013, 05:23 AM
  2. Not sure where to post this one...
    By John Fusco in forum Other Porsche Passions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-18-2013, 05:23 AM
  3. 4 post vs 2 post lift advice requested
    By caproader in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 10:56 AM
  4. My Last Post
    By boxster03 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-12-2008, 05:35 AM
  5. Post for wtb 69-73 3.2
    By Bobby Smith in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-22-2007, 07:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.