Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 67 inlets...different from later..

  1. #1

    67 inlets...different from later..

    Hello all.

    I have been looking thro' my stash: I find a big differnece between some inlets I have dated 66, and all the later ones.

    thes have a sand-cast look finish..later ones look smooth...and are painted black too.

    the early inlets have a cast finish to the ports, later ones machined..

    When did this change?

    they all seem to be Mag alloy..

    What was correct on a 67, and 68 S engine I wonder?

    Kind regards
    David

  2. #2
    David,

    I asked this very question a while back but didn't get a response. I have a 901/05 engine which has aluminum manifolds, these are a bright silver color. If you look in the factory workshop manual, this is the correct color. Then later, the manifolds changed to black, and may be magnesium. Perhaps this was done around the same time as the 1968 introduction of the 911T.

    Also, my manifolds have rectangular holes between the mounting flanges. The PMO manifolds have circular holes.

    Hope this helps? In any event a 1967 normal is a 901/06 engine, my belief is that they should be natural aluminum with rectangular holes. Perhaps one of The Known Experts could chime in here.

    Best,

    John
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  3. #3
    Thanks:

    I have now found the 1967 "S "inlet, it is dull die cast, and has no paint on it.

    The 1968 has paint on it.

    The 1966 is bright shiny, sand cast magnesium alloy..I'm 100% sure of this..it looks very smilar to the mag Solex inlets in fact.

    Hope this helps someone..

    Kind regards
    David

  4. #4
    So many questions, so few answers....
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    442

    1967 S intake

    Mine is a stock '67S and the inlet has the dull finish from the casting. No paint or indication that it ever was painted.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    1967 911S Coupe
    1991 944S2 Coupe

    Past projects:
    1967 912 Coupe
    1969 911T Coupe
    1985.5 944 SR Coupe

  5. #5
    David, thanks. I will check to see whether mine are aluminum or magnesium.

    Here is a photo of Chuck Stoddard's 67S (with some "extras.)
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  6. #6
    Hi,

    Just in case it helps, I have some aluminium manifolds which are date stamped 67. I am not 100% sure but I have seen different markings around the year stamp (on different manifolds) which may indicate the month. On this pair there are 4 small marks and thus I think the date is 4 67.




    Alan

  7. #7
    This is a 68S motor, sadly no longer in my posession. The manifolds match the magnesium case

    Nick Moss - Early 911S #476 - RGruppe #318 - early911.co.uk

Similar Threads

  1. WTB tall inlets
    By haasad in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2012, 11:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.