1967 911S coupe

[Soterik]

Nope not mine,

But I do know the seller, a good guy, and he's been on here a time or two.

I confess I don't know the car... but it's a sunroof! Interesting sport seats

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...07085492QQrdZ1

[voitureltd]

Nope not mine,

But I do know the seller, a good guy, and he's been on here a time or two.

I confess I don't know the car... but it's a sunroof! Interesting sport seats

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...07085492QQrdZ1

Did you all notice the S identification on the A pillar plate along with the gas tank area S suffix. That is what is missing on so many recently purported to be S cars ( read the responces from other forum members)(another 1967 911 S on ebay ) and others,that I questioned as my memory interfered with accepting these seemingingly conflicting contentions that even though they were different they were still authentic 911S cars originally.
I realize that it is possible that they be manufactured differently from time to time HOWEVER I have not seen a official Porsche document to explain the reason the teutonic even handed reasoning (that usually seems to prevail at Porsche) for various numbering proceedures( administered by the Porsche factory ) be different, as reasoned by the many responses claiming that some were numbered differently this way and that way. ie S on A pillar plate,not on A pillar plate.
The S stamped on front gas tank area metal and then mabe not???.
In in the expanding S Porsche market as when Corvette,Muscle, and classic eara cars headed for the moon,over the last decades, lots more of some models were on the market than were ever made. Is there a consensus to be made on serial stamping(s) to get to the real "no stories" 911S identification location or absence of such in any/all of the three serial number locations and the reason(s) they may be authentic but different from one car to the next. I am new to ESSES so please direct me ( and others ) to the issue that explains this delema so we can be enlightened. Thanks Tony@Voitureltd

[boxster03]

Did you all notice the S identification on the A pillar plate along with the gas tank area S suffix

no i did not

even saving the picture and expanding the detail i could not see this "S". pls. let us know how you see this detail. how bout a post of it.

[voitureltd]

no i did not

even saving the picture and expanding the detail i could not see this "S". pls. let us know how you see this detail. how bout a post of it.

I see it however the Kardex( if authentic) says it all. I am getting a Kardex for all my Porsches so no explainations from seemingly mixed opinions on these subjects will ever make a difference.

[boxster03]

What are 4 expanders COA looks legit.

[Bill Meyer]

I haven't seen a 67S without the stamp in the body by the gas tank. Is there one out there for sale like that?

[rngpc]

Car sold on ebay last year. I saw and drove car when it was here in Fort Worth for sale. I think it sold for 22-23 or so on Ebay. Looked good and drove well. Bought from European Collectibles. OK paint - had original seats in it. Can't figure out why it was repainted white. Had some rust in driver's floor pan which has obviously been redone - undercoated with rhino-lining. Mediocre chrome. Nice car to restore.

[voitureltd]

I haven't seen a 67S without the stamp in the body by the gas tank. Is there one out there for sale like that?

Check out "another 1966 911s on ebay" ebay photos #170096441325 and reference the responces from forum members that it is an authentic 911S.

[scooter]

170096441325

This car does have the S stamped to the right of the vin number under the front hood area.

It is just very hard to make out because of the surface rust.

It is seen better in the last row of pics in the middle picture of the three of the front vin area.

I hope that helps,
Scooter

[nick-moss]

As current high bidder on the red ebay car I am happy that it is a proper S. I have never seen an S without the S suffix by the tank, but have yet to see the S stamped on the aluminium VIN plate. The white car, the subject of this thread, looks like yet another very nice restoration candidate. That's 4 that have surfaced in the last few months. I wonder when supply will meet demand and the price for a resto candidate drops under $30K?