Dear all,
I'm new to this forum and I am writing to you to ask your advice.
I am about to embark on the restoration of a 1972 911 2.4 S with a Porsche restorer here in Switzerland, Mr. Tobias Nussbaum of the company Flat Six Cars. The car will not be a daily driver or used for rallies / racing. I am not buying the car as a speculation item or investment. It is more a dream car to enjoy in the summer, perhaps 2-3,000 miles per year. I've been waiting to buy my first great car all my life (about as long as the '72 model has been around!).
Mr. Nussbaum has a Swiss donor car with matching numbers ready to go and has offered a complete restoration covering body, engine, transmission, suspension, interior, etc. for a fixed price. This would give me a completely stock 911 S as it was available in 1972. Although I am a layman, I visited Mr. Nussbaum's workshop in Basel and had a very positive impression of his work (I drove with him in a restored 2.7 RS), his professionalism and his trustworthiness.
On Saturday we are meeting to discuss the project (dates, options, contracts, etc.). I am anxious to get the project going because this is the dream car I have been looking for.
As you guys are experts on the 911 S, I thought I'd ask you one or two questions on how you would recommend doing the restoration:
1. The fixed price includes waxing of the underbody but not a complete galvanisation in a zinc bath. This would cost several thousand dollars more. Would you recommend adding this step in order to improve the quality of the car? If, for any reason, I needed to sell the car in future, would this be an important item a buyer would look for?
2. In deciding on how far to go with restoration options, my first priority is to have a car with a sound basis, i.e. to have the right quality built into the car from the beginning. Thus the question on galvanisation. The second priority would be for driveability / ease of use. This might include original Recaro sport seats for my wife's bad back, and perhaps power assisted brakes. Everything above that in the direction of "pimping" (leather coverings, high-end stereo, etc.) I'd like to avoid. However, are there any options or aspects of the restoration that you would recommend that I insist upon, either for useability or because it would be a must if I needed to sell the car later on?
3. Is there anything critical I should review with regard to the restoration contract?
Thank you very much for your advice!
Guru Sivaraman