Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A-Arms / Lower Control arms - are they worn out?

  1. #1
    Senior Member 72911E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London / Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    162

    A-Arms / Lower Control arms - are they worn out?

    Hi......hope u can help!.

    I think I need to replace the A-Arms / lower control arms on my 72E but want to check as just seen the price for them!

    Example - turning off the road and into car park, when I go over the lip of the pavement the car creeks (as if bushings are gone), first at the front of the car and also at rear when the rear wheels go over the bump.

    Is this just bushing or something else? If it is the A-Arm at the front making the noise what would be causing the similar noise from rear?

    Thanks
    Derek
    '72 911E 2.4 Coupe RHD - Blue

  2. #2

    A arms

    Sounds like youve got poly bushings which in this case is why the creaking sounds and is normal. But to be sure, an inspection of your suspension is in order for your own peace of mind.
    Richard aka le Zookeeper
    early reg #1128

  3. #3
    So many questions, so few answers....
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    442

    Bushings, bushings and more bushings

    A-arm bushings, front and rear sway bar bushings, spring plate bushings, tailing arm bushings. Your creaks and groans and likely to come from these areas. You'll have to inspect the A-arms to replace the bushings so you can get a good look at them when they are off the car. Same with the other areas.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    1967 911S Coupe
    1991 944S2 Coupe

    Past projects:
    1967 912 Coupe
    1969 911T Coupe
    1985.5 944 SR Coupe

  4. #4

    A-Armss/Lower Control

    if your 72E originally had hydro-pneumatic suspension (?) its possible your A-arms are not boxed, and the bars WILL FAIL at the weld joint where the arm joins the torsion bar housing. In other words, if the arm going from torsion bar tube at right angles out to ball joint is a channel section with an open bottom, you should replace them both with a boxed A arm. My 71E originally had the Hydro-pneumatic suspension, and a Koni conversion was installed in the late 70's, by changing the shocks and uprights but not the A-arms. On the hydro suspension the front suspension load goes compressively up the upright, but on the torsion bar suspension the load is cantilevered through the ball joint arm to the torsion bar. My DS failed at about 65k miles 2 miles from the house, going 20 mph, the other I found cracked with frequent inspections. $75 each from 20th Street Auto in Phoenix, off any non-Hydro early car that'll match your Torsion bar type.

Similar Threads

  1. Front Control Arms or A-Arms for 911/912/914
    By Bert in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-27-2012, 05:21 PM
  2. FS 72 control arms
    By dallaseurocars in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2010, 10:21 AM
  3. FS: 930 Rear Control arms
    By 911quest in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 02:30 PM
  4. FS: SWB Control Arms A Arms
    By bob tilton in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2008, 09:05 AM
  5. 911 Front Control Arms AKA A-Arms For Sale
    By Bert in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-07-2007, 04:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.