Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Early 70's SCCA Class Designations

  1. #1
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780

    Early 70's SCCA Class Designations

    I'm looking for general information on what the various SCCA racing classes in the 60/70s required (i.e. C/P, D/P, E/P etc.) in regard to 911's? Not today's designations, but those back in the day.

    For instance, what class would a completely stock '72 S have been placed in? What about a stock T? What about something with a modified engine and wider wheels/tires? Thanks.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by CurtEgerer
    I'm looking for general information on what the various SCCA racing classes in the 60/70s required (i.e. C/P, D/P, E/P etc.) in regard to 911's? Not today's designations, but those back in the day.

    For instance, what class would a completely stock '72 S have been placed in? What about a stock T? What about something with a modified engine and wider wheels/tires? Thanks.
    When I raced in SCCA during 1977-80, my 1967S, which Grady Clay set up for SCCA at that time, raced in D/P. I think that now it is in C/P.
    S Registry #265
    R Gruppe #224

  3. #3
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,874
    Hi Curt,

    I don't have the specs at hand, they should be Don's shop, but let me try to dust off some of the cobwebs.

    This dates from around 75-76 on, I will defer to someone older for prior info.

    EP was generally 356 and 914 and some 912.
    There were a few GP 356s.
    DP was both SWB and LWB 911 up to 2ltr then in early 80 924.
    CP 914-6 Some 911s but I think this was prior to mid 70's.
    BP was where a Trans Am 911 would run.

    Now for some fun.
    1 Bob Overby followed by John O'Steen
    2 Don Istook DP SWB sold to Dave Bouzaglou
    3 Don Istook DP Targa
    4 Grady in the shade
    5 John Schneider DP 924
    Attached Images Attached Images      

  4. #4
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,874
    Quote Originally Posted by CurtEgerer
    For instance, what class would a completely stock '72 S have been placed in? What about a stock T? What about something with a modified engine and wider wheels/tires? Thanks.
    I think any 2.2 or 2.4 would have been in CP. I do not remember seeing any which maybe because a 914-6 would be more competitive. The rules speced what you could do to the motor and the car. In the above photo #2 the SWB had been switched to LWB and was fitted with wings to meet the track spec that car started as a 67 tub.

    Bob

  5. #5
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,459
    Damnit Curt...... ya'got me looking through my house and garage at 6:00am for my '70's SCCA GCR.... and I can't find it.... ...

    Think I loaned to my buddy...

    Will get back to this.........
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  6. #6
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780
    I heard you didn't have enough to do anyway Chuck ... I knew somebody would have the rule book!

    So out of curiosity, what class would a car like mine have been classified in? 71T, 2.5L engine, 7 inch wheels, everything else pretty much stock - B/P???

  7. #7
    Relaxed Rich Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lake Stevens, WA
    Posts
    600
    Try here...

    http://www.sovren.org/competition/competition.htm

    ...and look under:

    SCCA GCR (General Competition Rules)
    1962 GCR
    1967 GCR
    1969 GCR

    SCCA PCS (Production Car Specifications)
    1962 PCS
    1967 PCS
    1969 PCS
    Rich
    1966 911 #303872
    ES#1197
    RG#478

  8. #8
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,874
    In DP we could run 7&8x15 but limit 2.0.
    The 2.5 would most likely be CP but not competitive against a 914-6 like Grady's or the Datsun's.
    BP would be amost the same as Trans Am spec if not identical which would be 2.8 or 3.0 RSR's.

  9. #9
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780
    Thanks Rich! I don't see any of the Production classes allowing a displacement increase (beyond 1.2mm overbore).

    According to those documents for 1969:

    A/P -- 904
    B/P -- LWB 911E/S Coupe/Targa
    C/P -- SWB 911/911L/911S Coupes & LWB 911T Coupe/Targa

  10. #10
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,459
    Still can't find my early 70's GCR... but Rich's link has some very cool information

    This is the way I remember it... remembering that I was an Alfa guy back then...

    When 911's first hit CA. in '65-'66 they were D-Production (Jerry Titus's first drive for Vasek was a D-Prod 911)

    When the 911S hit in '67 it was put into C-Prod, then soon after all 911's fell into the same category... Davey Jordan, Milt Minter, Allan Johnson, Bert Everit... and the rest, were all C-Prod winners and champs in '67 and '68...

    However, in both '67 and '68 'they' pulled a fast one on John Timanus and also got the 911 in B-Sedan....
    The same weekend in Daytona when Allan Johnson won the '68 C-Production run-offs, my friend Vic Provenzano was fighting off a 911 in his Afla GTA for the B-Sedan title...

    After the '68 season Timanus got wise and threw 911's out of Sedan racing...

    In '69 through about '71 I remember the 914-6's racing the 240-Z's for C-Prod... but was not sure where the 911's raced... and with Rich's link, looks like they were in B-Prod with the small block Corvettes and Cobras

    Into the early '70's EVERYTHING started changing in SCCA... John Bishop started a 'Pro' series IMSA that EVERYONE wanted to be in... And to answer THAT the SCCA REALLY started promoting the TransAm which 911's were in, then out, then in again.........

    Through it all, when they let'm race, 911's were winning somewhere...



    Ya'know Curt, if I were going to put class lettering on your car, even though the link shows different, I'd probably write C-Prod.............
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

Similar Threads

  1. Is color important to the early 70's 911
    By Mhead in forum General Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-15-2014, 06:12 AM
  2. WTB: early 70's seatbelts retractors
    By denson in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-24-2013, 05:18 PM
  3. Early 70's Seats
    By GirtAllerton72T in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-15-2010, 05:59 PM
  4. Early 70's 5 speed Pix
    By Paul Schooley in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-30-2006, 07:20 PM
  5. Early 70's at Norisring
    By CurtEgerer in forum General Info
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-27-2005, 12:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.