Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 68 911s

  1. #1

    68 911s

    Has anyone seen this one?

    What do you think?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...153784308&rd=1

  2. #2
    Neat color, but rusty as f---. Not sure about the VIN either. Missing tons of stuff (rocker decos, wrong speedo). This one will be interesting in watch.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  3. #3

    68S or L

    I thought that the 68 model was called an L not an S? Was the S a euro version only?

  4. #4
    Luft gekuhlt Bummler's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Valley...
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by ret9191
    I thought that the 68 model was called an L not an S? Was the S a euro version only?
    Yes...

    The 68 L was a one year US version with all the options of a Euro S but saddled with the air pump and the HP of a normal remedied by the advent of MFI in 69
    Stefan Josef Koch
    RGruppe #194/SRegistry #1063
    1969 Porsche 911E, Light Ivory (38 years and counting)
    2015 Porsche Cayman S
    2012 BMW R1200GS, 1973 BMW R75/5


    "An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." -E. Hemingway

  5. #5
    Euro S 160hp
    US L 130HP

    same trim etc
    Early 911S Registry #931
    --------------------------------
    1971 911 2.2S Coupe Albert Blue
    1971 911 2.2T Coupe Tangerine
    2005 997 C2S Coupe special 1965 slate grey
    1978 911 3.0 SC Targa Silver w/chrome trim

  6. #6

    S or L

    So is the car for sale an S or an L?

  7. #7
    This car is probably a stone's throw from my house.
    _B
    Sent from a pay phone

    888888 eL, Oph'eL'ia

    Instagram: werk_crew
    www.werkcrew.com
    www.werkcrew.tumblr.com
    www.handofwinter.tumblr.com

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    wash dc/ los angeles ca
    Posts
    880

    '68 911 S

    Pretty certain this is an "S" ,the seller is a very up front guy also member on the board 'brad" whom I'm sure will answer any questions pertaining to the car, he's also had numerous cars of a variety of years and models,albeit some
    quite rusty on ebay recently ,give him a call ! thanks Bert

  9. #9
    This is a really rough car. I'd rate it a #6 (parts car).

    What rust you CAN see is just the tip of the iceberg. Pass.

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

Similar Threads

  1. Porsche 911S Owners Manual 1969 911S 2.0
    By 72targa in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-19-2021, 07:29 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-03-2014, 11:45 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-04-2013, 03:48 AM
  4. Pending Russo & Steele Auctions of 1967 911S & 1969 911S
    By 72targa in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 11:11 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-24-2010, 03:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.