Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Leak down #'s off....compression good....

  1. #1
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516

    Leak down #'s off....compression good....

    Hi....need some opinions on a car I'm looking at.

    Compression #'s are good all the way across, within 5 lbs of each other.

    Leak down #'s are off. 3 cylinders at 90% to 95%, 3 cylinders at 60% to 70%.

    Owner is going to have a valve adjustment done to see if that brings the numbers up.

    But... just for my edification, it's usually rings or valves at this point right?

    So, if the numbers don't come up...it means a "top end". How much? $4k?

    Any input?

    thanks,
    Eric

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    882
    Carbon on the valves or worn guides will do that.....you can usually get the leak down to come around by tapping on the rocker while the cylinder is pressurized......

    Typically it means the top end is a little tired.
    Aaron Hatz
    Flat Six, inc.
    www.flat6.com

    Follow us on Facebook
    www.facebook.com/flatsixinc

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico
    Posts
    686
    I personally look real hard at leakdown #'s even if compression is good. 30-40% is pretty bad. My bet valves/guides 80%, ring related 20%. You did not state what kind of P engine but guessing air cooled and 4K should cover it. As for carbon between valve face and seat maybe but I have never been so lucky.
    Early 911S member #166

    I have no problem with the theory that all men are created equal.
    But after that moment you are on your own and nobody owes you a damn thing.

  4. #4
    Hi Eric,

    The great thing about leakdown testing is that it not only displays cylinder pressure values, it allows the person to find the source of any leakage.

    As you know, the majority of such leakage comes from the valves and rings so its imperative that the technician notes where he hears any air leaking from. If this isn't done, the tests lack any context and are thus, useless.

    Valve leaks are relatively cheap to repair but excess air escaping from the oil tank filler tube indicates problems that can be much more expensive to resolve.

    IMHO, the leakdown tests should be re-done as I'd suspect a problem with the procedure, if the compression figures are good.
    Steve Weiner
    Rennsport Systems
    Portland Oregon
    503.244.0990
    E-mail: porsche@rennsportsystems.com
    http://www.rennsportsystems.com

  5. #5
    aka techweenie Eminence Gris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,099
    I agree with Steve's last line.

    I've seen too many bad leakdowns to trust them totally. the procedure loosens carbon and it can pin a valve slightly open. Run the car and do the leakdown again. I bet the result is different.
    techweenie.com

    My parts fetcher: 2016 Tesla S | Currently building: 73 RSR tribute and 69 RS tribute

  6. #6
    Senior Member 911quest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Louisville KY
    Posts
    1,532
    Are all three of the suspect cylinders on the same bank?
    Tony Proasi

    52 split window coupe

  7. #7
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    Guys,

    Thanks for the replies. Not sure if the cylinders all on the same bank.

    At this point the car is rescheduled for another compression test, leakdown, and also for a valve adjust (not necessarily in that order). It's going to be done at a different shop as well.

    Have also asked current owner to drive the car a bit before this next appt., which shouldn't be an issue given the current weather we are having here in Seattle.

    thanks,
    Eric

  8. #8
    Make sure to decoke the valves and pistons using the "water method". Get her warmed up and running at 4000 RPM and use a spray bottle to inject water into the carb/MFI throats - don't add so much as to kill it - but this will usually break up the carbon and let things seat better.
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

  9. #9
    Hey Eric,

    BELIEVE the test.

    It's tempting to rationalize the numbers but unless you have affirmative evidence the leakdown was incorrectly performed, the data are the data.

    I went through the same thing with my '66. Leakdown showed 45%. I scratched my head like a monkey and thought, "Could it be carbon?" I poured Seafoam in, which had no effect on the leakdown but killed every mosquito in the County.

    "Hmm, something must be wrong with my testing technique." Not really. Something was wrong with the ENGINE.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  10. #10
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    John,

    So you tried Seafoam eh??? I haven't got the guts to try that on any of my cars yet....did use it in the gas on one of my trucks though.

    I'm interested in this car I'm looking at, but want to make sure what I've got in front of me, and will use the numbers as a point of negotiation on the price.

    Both the seller and I agreed to use a different shop to confirm the numbers. Body, paint, and original interior on this car are great, which are all more important to me at the outset.

    Guys,...thanks again!!

Similar Threads

  1. Compression Test
    By PorscheMan65 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 08:25 PM
  2. optimal compression 2,2
    By Johan H in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-10-2011, 11:17 AM
  3. 2.2T compression/leak numbers
    By jetdriver21 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-30-2007, 11:16 AM
  4. 2.7 high compression p's and c's
    By tfiv in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-04-2005, 07:20 AM
  5. compression
    By 72starga in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-24-2003, 03:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.