Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: MFI VS Weber on 911

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Coast, USA - Tysons, VA
    Posts
    244

    MFI VS Weber on 911

    Hi all. I have a mechanic who is trying to convince me that MFI is more of a headache than anything (dumping fuel into the oil and getting all of 8 MPG), and that I should install my Weber carbs instead during my rebuild. He says Webers are better in terms of reliability, no issues with gas getting into the oil, and that fuel consumption would be lower. This sounds wrong to me. Is it true that MFI gets such poor gas mileage? Isn't there a really simple fix for the gas getting dumped into the oil?

    The old mechanic said everyone wants MFI today because they either forgot or were not around to remember the huge problems MFI had. He said that was why they stopped using MFI and went to CIS and, later, Motronic. Is there any truth to what this long-time Porsche mechanic is telling me? Aren't Webers gas hogs and hard to keep in tune? Thanks in advance for any information and advice.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    372
    Sounds like if your pump is ready for a rebuild. I think you could probably rebuild the pump and throttle bodies for the cost of a new set of PMO (improved Webers).

    Are the throttle bodies getting loose, or is the pump going south? I would definitely stay with MFI though. I have all the parts for my car to convert back to MFI, I just need to find the time to do it though.
    Neil
    '73 911S targa

  3. #3
    old softie67S
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Sanibel Fl
    Posts
    457

    keep the mfi

    Most engine can be made to run fine with webers or pmo's' but a non worn properly tuned mfi system is a joy. Great power and razor edge throttle response. the exception is a car with an engine modified to a non stock porsche configuration. getting exact space cams for the pump is impossible unless the factory built an engine with mfi for the exact configuation of the engine.. The value of the car with it's original mfi is also worth the investment. The mfi was replaced with cis for emmission reasons. Fuel economy is a consideration for a daily commuter, not your 911 IMHO. good luck tom
    Tom

    67S soft rear window
    60 356 Cab
    70 914-6 3.2 short stroke twin plug
    05 Audi S4 Cabrio (commuter)
    05 Audi Alroad (family driver)
    Aprilia SR 50R (Sanibel scoot)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Coast, USA - Tysons, VA
    Posts
    244
    Just to be clear, the car is currently basically runnng OK with MFI. I think the engine has a problem on cylinder 6, which I will have checked out and fixed soon. It seems to be running on five cylinders to me and it might be as simple as a bad plug wire, but could be a worse problem. Dunno. Anyway, the current, installed setup is a stock 911T MFI system working with a stock 2.4 911T engine. FYI, the currently installed engine is not the car's original engine. I have the original engine is on a pallet in my garage, just awaiting its rebuild. On the shelf, I have a good (checked out by a pro) 911E complete setup, which is what I would use on the rebuilt, original engine.

    Most of my experience has been with CIS and Motronic, other than my 1972 911E with MFI, but that was a long time ago and I don't really remember the fuel economy figures. My other Porsche is a 1989 3.2 factory Turbo-Look Cabriolet (Motronic), which is a completely different beast.

    Anyway, is it true that the use of Webers provides much better gas mileage over MFI? I did not think this was the case.

    Further, regarding the MFI dumping fuel into the oil, isn't there some easy fix for this (like disconnecting the cold start solenoid or something easy like that)?

    Thanks for the advice.

  5. #5

    gas mileage

    you dont remember because long ago gas mileage was a non issue.
    A well tuned MFI is unmatched and unique and must be preserved.
    you can adapt Webers to any 911 engine all day long however it is another story making a carb or CIS car into a MFI. unique heads, rare parts, fascinating fuel delivery system many have never seen.
    I say keep it MFI btw MFI cars still sporting all their goodies are often worth $5K more.
    As far as mileage, I believe the differences are not great, maybe a poorly tuned MFI will get poor mileage.
    So albeit pricey to rebuild, once renewed it is more stable than carbs, it is well worth preserving and enjoying it driving.
    nothing like an MFI howl.
    Richard aka le Zookeeper
    early reg #1128

  6. #6
    The sharp throttle response of MFI in tune is thrilling.

    MFI mileage does not have to be any less than carbs. It depends on your driving style and the tune of the MFI pump. If it is too rich, it will use more gas. Properly set up, it gets better mileage.

    Porsche switched to MFI from carbs to get more power but also found they could get better fuel mileage if they drove at a controllable pace, like at LeMans. For hillclimbs and the Targa and such they used more fuel because they were going faster than the old cars. The MFI has superior fuel atomization due to the high injection pressure. This is good for more powerful combustion. MFI shuts off fuel on the over-run if all the speed switches and such are working and the other barometric controls, speed controls, and throttle controls mean that it is very precise and efficient, more so than carbs.

    The key is setting up the MFI in proper tune and making sure the pump is in spec. If the pump is worn or out of adjustment, it will use more fuel and not have as good of response. It cannot sense airflow like carbs or CIS so it must be tuned to deliver the correct amount of fuel.

    Regarding the fuel/oil mixing: the injection pistons rely on the extremely tight tolerance between them and their bores to keep the fuel separate from the oil inside the pump housing on the other side of the piston. Therefore, if your pump is worn, fuel and oil can mix. A pump will not do this if it is in spec.

    MFI is better if it is tuned to spec. Carbs may be a little easier to get tuned but give up a little of the performance at the Nth degree.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  7. #7
    Longhoods forever! silverc4s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in Texas
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by M491
    Just to be clear, the car is currently basically runnng OK with MFI. I think the engine has a problem on cylinder 6, which I will have checked out and fixed soon. It seems to be running on five cylinders to me and it might be as simple as a bad plug wire, but could be a worse problem. Dunno. Anyway, the current, installed setup is a stock 911T MFI system working with a stock 2.4 911T engine. FYI, the currently installed engine is not the car's original engine. I have the original engine is on a pallet in my garage, just awaiting its rebuild. On the shelf, I have a good (checked out by a pro) 911E complete setup, which is what I would use on the rebuilt, original engine.

    Most of my experience has been with CIS and Motronic, other than my 1972 911E with MFI, but that was a long time ago and I don't really remember the fuel economy figures. My other Porsche is a 1989 3.2 factory Turbo-Look Cabriolet (Motronic), which is a completely different beast.

    Anyway, is it true that the use of Webers provides much better gas mileage over MFI? I did not think this was the case.

    Further, regarding the MFI dumping fuel into the oil, isn't there some easy fix for this (like disconnecting the cold start solenoid or something easy like that)?

    Thanks for the advice. M
    Your cylinder #6 problem COULD be MFI related, but is more than likely a fouled plug, bad plug wire, or an intake valve related problem. You could swap injectors with cyl 6 and another cylinder to be sure that the injector is not plugged. Try a new spark plug and a known good plug wire first. Do a compression & leak down test on all cylinders.

    Neither MFI or Webers (or PMOs) will win any fuel consumption awards. The MPG at cruise in top gear is okay, but in all other modes both carbs and MFI will not use fuel efficiently. I would say that MFI in proper CMA tune, freshly rebuilt should be able to outperform carbs for mileage.

    Most old-line Porsche mechanics can work on Webers, while few have the skills and experience to get an MFI system to peak performance. So I would be concerned that he is leading you in the direction of his comfort factor.
    Bill Conway, Early S Registry member #254
    1970 S, 2.2L Silvermetallic Coupe
    1973 T, 3.2L Black Carrera Targa
    1969 T, 2.4L Silvermetallic Targa

  8. #8
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,459
    As you know Mauro when everything is new, right, and tuned, MFI is a pleasure and a monster performer... However it's probably THE most uneconomical 'on demand' system EVER invented. Even on a hot rodded MFI motor the difference in mileage between low RPM 5th gear cruising and 10/10's track driving is mind boggling.... With mine that difference is 20 vs. 7...

    ... And YES, I hear that back in the day most old school Porsche wrenches thought they were at least finicky, and mostly a big PITA.... I also hear that in '69 the Bosch 'rebuild/new exchange program' was WAY beyond it's capacity.... But that was before mechanics were used to'm... then 'all' the MFI rebuilders were around..... now, there's about 3.

    Now, with a ton of money, they can be made smooth and reliable...

    .... the question is , what the hell happens when THOSE guys go away...

    Cheers
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Coast, USA - Tysons, VA
    Posts
    244
    Yeah, I am wondering if the mechanic is guiding me straight into his comfort zone, or hoping I'll put on Webers and allow him to just keep the MFI. I dont really know. Thanks everyone for the advice and info. If I can drive calmly and get decent mileage, I don't mind poor economy on the track. It's not like I'll be running any endurance races. Cheers everyone!

  10. #10
    Let us know what you go with and how it works out.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

Similar Threads

  1. Weber 40 ids
    By jdj123 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-18-2012, 09:29 AM
  2. WTB: top for a weber
    By 356robo in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-28-2011, 03:47 PM
  3. Weber 40 IDA 3C1/3C
    By Zithlord in forum General Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 12:30 AM
  4. Weber 40 IDS
    By byron in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 08:18 AM
  5. FS:Weber 40 IDS
    By OliveR in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 12:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.