Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 68 "hot rod" suspension -- request your input

  1. #1
    Die schönste Rennstrecke der Welt. Nordschleife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    375

    68 "hot rod" suspension -- request your input

    Now that Eric has rebuilt my 68S/L brakes (thanks!) and that's all sorted, I'm turning my attention to the suspension.

    My 1968 911 coupe -- still a short wheelbase car -- is already modified with rear SC flares and has 7x15 front and 8x15 rear wheels. This larger tire footprint combined with the original suspension all around leads me to scratch my head when approaching a rebuild of the suspension. I'd appreciate your thoughts.

    At the moment, the rear suspension arm bushes squeak during travel, and the front suspension (original spec) sits at typical "three fingers high" level. The steering box is original as are A-arms and the factory front sway bar. There is no sway bar in the rear, which has Koni shocks mounted at present. All-in-all it's a fairly stock set-up in need of freshening.

    The objective is to replace/rebuild the suspension to slightly more sporting configuration for sporting street driving. I don't want to go to far in the direction of race configuration with resulting loss of street driveability.

    Given this, if you were in my shoes, what would you recommend for:

    Overall set-up and ride height?
    Shocks/struts?
    Torsion bars (solid/hollow & sizes)?
    Bushings?
    Sway bar(s)?

    Thanks in advance for all your input.

    Best Regards,
    Andy
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Early 911S Registry #1246
    1968 Porsche 911 Cotswold Blue/Schwartz #118 35153
    1962 Marcos G.T. 1000 Gullwing historic race car - now sold and racing in FIA events in Sweden
    ---------------------------------------
    "Pro Patria Vigilans"

  2. #2
    Senior Member super9064's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,184
    I'm in the same boat, I think I will Use larger F/R Torsion bars, keep the stock sway bars, Brakes are stock, which will work fine because the car will be at least 200lbs lighter. The front suspension will eventually be upgraded to a SC or Carrera, w/ the aluminum cross member. Height, as low as I can get without compromising driveability. I've had a car with hard bushings, very annoying, stick to stock for the street, brand new stock bushings, compared to old worn bushings make quite a difference.
    Rob Abbott

  3. #3
    Card carryin' member! mjmoran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordschleife
    Given this, if you were in my shoes, what would you recommend for:

    Overall set-up and ride height?
    Shocks/struts?
    Torsion bars (solid/hollow & sizes)?
    Bushings?
    Sway bar(s)?

    Thanks in advance for all your input.

    Best Regards,
    Andy

    Andy, my 68 is set up as follows:
    shocks (ft/rr bilsteins with raised spindles -- painted Koni red of course )
    T bars 21/28
    bushings ERP poly bronze ft/rr with rear monoballs
    sways 18/15 ft/rr

    ft suspension is taken off a 930 with Al crossmember although I kept the early quicker ratio steering rack and adapted it to fit Turbo tie rods.

    Brakes and 3,2 Carrera ft/rr

    All in all I am very happy and would change nothing on my set up. I feel it is very nice for back road driving and still relatively quiet.

    Good luck.
    Michael
    '56 T-1 356 bent window coupe...
    68 911L Burgandy Red R Gruppe #388
    72 911S Coupe, Sepia Brown

  4. #4
    Card carryin' member! mjmoran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by super9064
    I've had a car with hard bushings, very annoying, stick to stock for the street, brand new stock bushings, compared to old worn bushings make quite a difference.
    The ERP bronze bushings are FAR superior to any other bushing out there for race or street use IMHO. I would give them a go...
    Michael
    '56 T-1 356 bent window coupe...
    68 911L Burgandy Red R Gruppe #388
    72 911S Coupe, Sepia Brown

  5. #5
    Die schönste Rennstrecke der Welt. Nordschleife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    375

    Red face 1968 Suspension -- Fast Street

    Thanks Rob and Michael. Appreciate your advice.

    The 21/28 torsion bar rate is interesting; my initial prediction was close at 22/28 based upon local Porsche DE advice.

    The Elephant Racing bushings had caught my eye but I wondered if the stock rubber wouldn't be best for street driving -- wouldn't the ERP bushings add a fair amount of noise transmission (of course, given how noisy/squeaky my bushings are now, I suppose that's an ironic thing to say...).

    Mike, where did you get the raised spindle Bilsteins, please?

    And what front-to-rear rake should I shoot for? O degrees? 3/4 degree? More?

    Keep the comments & advice coming, please!

    Thanks,
    Andy
    Early 911S Registry #1246
    1968 Porsche 911 Cotswold Blue/Schwartz #118 35153
    1962 Marcos G.T. 1000 Gullwing historic race car - now sold and racing in FIA events in Sweden
    ---------------------------------------
    "Pro Patria Vigilans"

  6. #6
    Andy, what's that other car in the pic???? Looks interesting.
    Paul Schooley
    71 911T (RS wanabe w/2.7L juice)
    S Reg #863
    R Gruppe #330

  7. #7
    Card carryin' member! mjmoran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordschleife
    Thanks Rob and Michael. Appreciate your advice.

    The 21/28 torsion bar rate is interesting; my initial prediction was close at 22/28 based upon local Porsche DE advice.

    The Elephant Racing bushings had caught my eye but I wondered if the stock rubber wouldn't be best for street driving -- wouldn't the ERP bushings add a fair amount of noise transmission (of course, given how noisy/squeaky my bushings are now, I suppose that's an ironic thing to say...).

    Mike, where did you get the raised spindle Bilsteins, please?

    And what front-to-rear rake should I shoot for? O degrees? 3/4 degree? More?

    Keep the comments & advice coming, please!

    Thanks,
    Andy
    21/28 or 22/28...not sure there would be much real difference. If I had more weight up front with a larger tank I would possibly change.

    I would not hesitate with the ERPs on a street car -- mine is. They are quiet, and actually give a better ride as the stiction is eliminated.

    Can't remember where I had the Bilsteins done...there are many available sources.

    Rake...hmmm...I set mine to be just at the top of the rear tire with 205/60 15s then set the front to same attitude. There is a slight positive rake though. Here is a photo...
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Michael
    '56 T-1 356 bent window coupe...
    68 911L Burgandy Red R Gruppe #388
    72 911S Coupe, Sepia Brown

  8. #8
    Yes, there is much less friction with the PolyBronze. They are aligned better and have closer tolerances. The Polyurethane part is a shock-absorber just like the rubber but the steel/Bronze bearing makes for more accurate suspension movement.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  9. #9
    Blessed be the lowered RickS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Worshington State
    Posts
    1,360
    I did a complete suspension upgrade using Elephant Racing's Street Track 1 polybronze set-up with larger T-bars, new struts and shocks, and a front sway on the 914. The original stock suspension was getting a little tired, but the transformation was nothing less than absolutely stunning. Where I was impressed with the 914's sure footedness before, it now carves corners like no car I have driven. Before, where I could respectively keep up with 996s and 997s in the twisties, (I did not say the straights) I am confident that I could now run circles around them, but just give me more power!!!

    I was afraid that going to the polybronze would be jarring and sacrifice ride quality, but have been pleasantly surprised.

    In case you are interested: http://www.elephantracing.com/suspen...11packages.htm
    71 914 3.0, 82 SC, ESR 376, RG 307

    "The problem with the world is, the ignorant are cock-sure and the intelligent are full of doubt." Bertram Russell

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    BKK,Thailand
    Posts
    244
    i too recommend Elephant racing stuff.
    i have street track 2 on my car and love the set up.
    I have koni classic on my car, i found that it's a bit soft for track but it's nice for the street.
    I will switch to bilsteins when i can find a strut that take bilsteins insert.
    chuck is a great guy and very helpful.
    cheers
    tenn

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Special Extended Hub 380mm "RS" "RSR" Thick Grip Steering Wheel
    By Allen Henderson in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-06-2014, 12:47 PM
  2. FS: Special Extended Hub 380mm Thick grip "RS" "RSR" steering wheel
    By Allen Henderson in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-30-2013, 01:47 PM
  3. FS "RS" "RSR" Special Extended Hub Thick Grip 380mm Steering Wheel
    By Allen Henderson in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2012, 07:56 AM
  4. suspension input please
    By tull in forum General Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-08-2010, 06:04 PM
  5. smart suspension "inerters"
    By Flieger in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 10:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.