Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: 993 vs. a Longhood

  1. #1

    993 vs. a Longhood

    I am the proud owner of a very well sorted '95 Carrera 4 (993). After spending a year and $$$ to get the car in perfect condition, I'm now starting to feel the pull of an early 911...Not an "S" but possibly a "T" or even an "E."

    Although my 993 has ice cold a/c, a very fast and torquey (for me) motor and a ton of upgrades (everything from a top-notch respray, to a fresh top-end, suspension, RS clutch/LWF, Rennsport chip, HID headlights, etc, etc...) I look at a longhood (lwb) and drool. And although the 993 is fun to drive, there's a certain rawness missing. I guess it boils down to the fact that the 993 is an amazing daily driver. The issue is that I don't use it as a daily driver.

    I'm contemplating either putting the car up for sale, or offer as a trade for a 69-73 non-S that's either been restored (+/- cash) or is in original condition.

    For those on the board that have owned/driven a 993, can you tell me what it was like to also own an early 911? Pure horsepower is a distant runner-up to feeling connected to the car.

    I've searched tons of archive posts and wanted to get the board's collective input regarding the value of my 993 as a worthy trade (I would ask around $32.5k for the 993. Seriously underwater, but that's ok) and how the driving experience differs from an early 911.

    Thanks!
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    95 C4 / Guards Red...(Sold)
    2005 997 Carrera Arctic Silver/Black...(Sold)
    95 C4 / Polar Silver...(Sold)
    10 Cayman S / Atlas Grey

  2. #2
    That's a very fair asking price for your car...

    I had a 96 993, and a few long hoods... The nice thing is that the view won't be much different from the driver's seat. I used to joke that while the 993 was gorgeous from the outside, in my garage... But when I was actually behind the wheel of it, I felt like I was driving a 911SC with better shifter and AC. The 993 power delivery was a little too smooth and quiet for my taste, making the car deceptively quick (and bad for your licence) but ultimately not as satisfying. The front end of the long hood will feel lighter, the engine while less powerful will feel more responsive, the whole car more connected, and overall, you will have just as much fun (if not more) but at lower speeds. All in all, good for your licence...

    And now for stuff that'll get me banned: the SC that preceded the 993 in my garage and the 996 that followed it both felt more "connected" to me...Yes, even a damn 996 ;-) Maybe my 993 was suffering from tired shocks (at 45K miles?), I'll never know, but it was the most dissapointing 911 I ever owned (yet the most beautiful one) - too quiet, too smooth, too GT...

    I think you will love an oldie...
    Greg.
    ----------
    72 911T - 73 2002
    #1461

  3. #3
    Senior Member joegt3cup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Colebrook CT
    Posts
    1,070
    I will try and give you some insight from my experience. The very first Porsche I purchased was back in 1985... a 1979 911SC. It was a very nice street car but as the years rolled by my interest changed and I was no longer interested in street cars. In 1994 I purchased my first factory built track car a 1992 Cup USA 911 this was more towards my interest and new hobby. In 2002 I upgraded to a GT3 Cup Car once campaigned by Porsche AG in the SuperCup series and consider this my Porsche high water mark to date. I also purchased a 993 street car for my wife to drive. I would drive the car on occasion and although it had good power and torque I found it fat, heavy and wondered why anyone owns these things but it was a cab and she loved it. When I decided to get out of racing and go back to a street car I first thought an RS America would fit the bill. I found a car flew to Florida to pick it up and within a few miles of starting the journey home I knew it was a mistake and said I would sell it the moment I got home and did. Soooo were was I to go from here were my Porsche days over ? Well I had never owned an early car and decided perhaps this was the direction I should go... they are powerful, light and nimble all the things I valued in my race cars. In the end I purchased a 67 911 and have never looked back. I hope this helps.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Joe Annicelli
    Early 911S Registry #751
    Polo Red/Black 1967 Porsche 911S Coupe "Walter"
    Black/Red 1967 Alfa GTJr. Coupe "Nero"
    Italian Red 1994 Ducati 900SS/SP looks fast standing still
    Italian Red 1957 Gilera 150 Sport

    Ahhhh the sixties... I envision myself one early Saturday morning wearing plaid shorts, black shoes with white socks smoking a cigarette heading to the hardware store to buy a bag of nails.
    SWB cars are an acquired taste however once acquired theirs no turning back.

  4. #4
    I've been lucky as a PCA driving instructor to have driven everything from a '65 911 to a 2008 997 GT3 over the past eight years. The 993 is essentially a grand touring car. It has very smooth power delivery, long gearing, comfortable ride, excellent brakes and handling. It is easy to drive as a GT, but when you start driving it like a sports car, the gearing is wrong and it is reluctant to turn in (the 996 GT3 fixes this somewhat). What the 993 doesn't have is communicative steering, sharp throttle response, usable throttle steering, sharp turn in, and "tossability". These are qualities a nimble and lithe early 911 has in spades - and why it is so rewarding to drive quickly. You could think of the 993 experience as a bit lazy, and the early 911 as attention grabbing.
    Randy Wells
    Automotive Writer/Photographer/Filmmaker
    www.randywells.com/blog
    www.hotrodfilms.com

    Early S Registry #187

  5. #5
    Lighting Specialist jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    4,268
    SWB!

    What Randy said:

    What the 993 doesn't have is communicative steering, sharp throttle response, usable throttle steering, sharp turn in, and "tossability". These are qualities a nimble and lithe early 911 has in spades - and why it is so rewarding to drive quickly.

    That is spot-on. I've had the good fortune of owning or driving just about everything from 50's Speedsters to 997's, and my favorite by a wide margin, is my '67 SWB. It is kind of an abnormal Normal as it's been fussed with a bit. But I love the twitchy over-steer of the SWB's. I also like a proper 356 (they can surprise you with a good driver on twisties) and the SWB is for me the perfect blend of 356 and 911.

    I've had three 993's mainly because, like everyone else, I love the way they look. But they were all kinda of boring and I've never held onto one for very long.

    I'm going to get pelted for this by my fellow enthusiasts, but I much prefer the SWB over the LWB's that I have owned (and some of the LWB's were pretty decent cars). They were great (9.5), but the SWB is fantastic (10.0). Again, though, my SWB is a bit of a freak.

    To get back to your question...

    If you like to drive in a spirited manner at times, there's just no comparison between an early 911 (any proper early 911) and a 993. Go for it!

    Cheers,
    JohnA
    Lighting Resources for Hardcore Air-Cooled Porsche Enthusiasts”
    ——-
    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    AC Shop: BEST-IN-CLASS Air Cooled 911 Lighting Parts => 911BestInClass.com
    AC Site: The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com
    Instagram: Please Follow => AC Shop Instagram

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by a911s View Post
    I've been lucky as a PCA driving instructor to have driven everything from a '65 911 to a 2008 997 GT3 over the past eight years. The 993 is essentially a grand touring car. It has very smooth power delivery, long gearing, comfortable ride, excellent brakes and handling. It is easy to drive as a GT, but when you start driving it like a sports car, the gearing is wrong and it is reluctant to turn in (the 996 GT3 fixes this somewhat). What the 993 doesn't have is communicative steering, sharp throttle response, usable throttle steering, sharp turn in, and "tossability". These are qualities a nimble and lithe early 911 has in spades - and why it is so rewarding to drive quickly. You could think of the 993 experience as a bit lazy, and the early 911 as attention grabbing.
    Randy, I am so glad to hear you say that, because that summarizes my feelings to a T. Mine felt like GT, and as much as that car is achingly beautiful and revered as the last aircooled, it was the most dissapointing 911 I ever owned...

    Glad I'm not alone in this... IMO, if you want to have fun at lower speeds, an early 911 (or even a 912) is a ball... For fun at high speed on a track, a CaymanS or cheap used 996 is the ticket... Anything in between will take $$$$$ to me made into something competitive...
    Greg.
    ----------
    72 911T - 73 2002
    #1461

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg D. View Post
    That's a very fair asking price for your car...

    The 993 power delivery was a little too smooth and quiet for my taste, making the car deceptively quick (and bad for your licence) but ultimately not as satisfying. The front end of the long hood will feel lighter, the engine while less powerful will feel more responsive, the whole car more connected, and overall, you will have just as much fun (if not more) but at lower speeds. All in all, good for your licence...
    Maybe my 993 was suffering from tired shocks (at 45K miles?), I'll never know, but it was the most dissapointing 911 I ever owned (yet the most beautiful one) - too quiet, too smooth, too GT...

    I think you will love an oldie...
    Thanks Greg,

    The 993 is so easy and satisfying to drive on longer trips, but my driving simply hasn't evolved that way. My 993 handled like a Buick until I spent a lot of time (and money) getting the suspension just right. Now it rides like it's on rails!

    Quote Originally Posted by joegt3cup View Post
    I had never owned an early car and decided perhaps this was the direction I should go... they are powerful, light and nimble all the things I valued in my race cars. In the end I purchased a 67 911 and have never looked back. I hope this helps.
    That's exactly what I'm looking for...enough power to have fun, but something that feels light and nimble. Thanks so much for the feedback.
    95 C4 / Guards Red...(Sold)
    2005 997 Carrera Arctic Silver/Black...(Sold)
    95 C4 / Polar Silver...(Sold)
    10 Cayman S / Atlas Grey

  8. #8
    Jason, I think you will find that most early 911s do not handle like they are on rails, at least not like a tricked out 993 will. The tires are skinnier, the wheel will move in your hands over bumps, and the front castor angle will not allow for as planted a front end feel. However, all these things do add to the involvement you will feel when driving a well maintained early 911. It will move around underneath you a bit - letting you know what's up and urging you to contol it. When you experience that fully you will be hooked. Now, if you put your Varioram 3.6 into an early RS/ST/RSR look hot rod and cam/chip it - Watch Out!

    Guys, thanks - I've actually thought about this stuff a lot. I enjoy it much more than all the minutia gazing. John, I agree with you about the SWB handling. It's not all that different from a LWB - everything just happens a lot faster.
    Randy Wells
    Automotive Writer/Photographer/Filmmaker
    www.randywells.com/blog
    www.hotrodfilms.com

    Early S Registry #187

  9. #9
    Well I think it is time to defend the 993 a bit.

    I own 2 911s, one is a 2.4S (with 2.7RS engine and semislick tyres) and the other is a 993 turbo WLS2.

    they are both great cars and the 993 turbo is a magnificent car. Its raw power is amazing , brakes are sensational and it looks...
    Whenever I feel bad I just take a drive with the 993 turbo and I do some hard accelerations on the motorway. Happiness turns back immediately. No other car achieves this.( I don't know american muscle cars, AC cobra?). This car is just a class for itself , much above a 2.4S.
    I enjoy very much driving it but for my favorite driving up some tiny mountain passes remains the old 2.4S. I am still too scared of the extremly high limits of the 993 turbo.
    Therefore, because I am not a good enough driver to enjoy driving at the limit with the 993 turbo I prefer the 2.4S for fun driving.

    Which one to sell if I had to sell one of the 2?
    Well, the 2.4S is my first Porsche ...

    Good luck
    Andreas

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by a911s View Post
    John, I agree with you about the SWB handling. It's not all that different from a LWB - everything just happens a lot faster.
    SWB is the most fun car on the planet. I am a convert.

    FWIW, these are all great cars. I could have as much fun w/ the thrust of the turbo as with my 165 tired SWB. Different flavors for different days, I say!
    Kenik
    - 1969 911S
    - 1965/66 911
    - S Reg #760
    - RGruppe #389

Similar Threads

  1. My first running longhood!
    By Sundevil64 in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-04-2014, 09:01 PM
  2. Colgan bra for longhood.
    By mikez in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-28-2011, 04:40 PM
  3. bastard of a longhood fs on the Bay
    By EARLY911ZOO in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-10-2010, 11:35 AM
  4. Longhood of the Day
    By BBausser in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-16-2009, 01:57 PM
  5. I know it's not a longhood.........
    By boba in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-12-2006, 07:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.