Page 68 of 94 FirstFirst ... 1858666768697078 ... LastLast
Results 671 to 680 of 940

Thread: Ultimate ST thread

  1. #671
    Quote Originally Posted by letsrollbabe View Post
    Guys, since the right front fender is missing on the car in the factory shop, it's possible that it was removed to go to another part of the shop to add the flare and remove the fuel filler door....and then prepped with a coating to keep the welds fresh for later final paint. Why else would it be missing? That right front fender was not replaced before the June LeMans race, and it is clear it is a steel fender with the crunch maintaining its shape, and not being just cracked away as a FG fender would have.
    um. Thanks for the explanation! It fits me. And adding the cube of the lighthouse on my part I do not need more to believe that it is metal instead of GRP. I understand that as said at the beginning it would be a "white" layer that was given to make the piece ready to paint after metal work. This layer used to be white? Or after the metal work did they turn black again?

  2. #672
    Quote Originally Posted by _gonbau View Post
    I to this day and observing the photos from ignorance also think that it is Grp. If it were "metal" I think it would be at the point of the black primer like the rest of the bodywork but on the contrary "white" is observed. I had never stopped to look at the detail of the hub of the lighthouse commented but my opinion is that it is still Grp .... From my humble opinion, with that of the fins I mean. If they widened the car by means of arches (front and rear), the rear bumpers must also have been widened as was the front bumper. The porsche worked these rear bumpers in a specific way or can we find the same welding seams in different S / Ts made by the factory? I hope you understand the question.
    I think i understand,you mean the wider extensions to the bumpers,mine were grp and moulded to fit the wider fenders in a one piece moulding,rather than cutting and extending etc

  3. #673
    To me it looks like the glass front fenders were offered early on with steel front fenders by 72. The M491 cars I have seen have steel front fenders.

  4. #674
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    Quote Originally Posted by rower View Post
    By lightweight interior do you mean M470 delete? Presumably you mean the 930kg cars are a world of difference from a regular S?

    No I was only talking about 1972 cars here. The "M470 delete", ie not having option M470 as a part of the build, applied only for 1970. From 1971 the option package changed away from having a specific M470 option to reinstate the trim to "E" level to having a "trim delete" option, M471, which carried on through to the RS in 1973.

    So I meant that there was a world of difference between a purpose built M491 2.5 ST at werk1 and a regular production 911S even if that S had a M471 option. Almost all of the differences (apart from flared bodywork) were under the skin and especially were the mechanical parts like engine, cooling, reinforcing, electrical etc
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  5. #675
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,701
    It's not just the fender missing, the door is also missing.
    Anyone who's done any lead work on these cars knows you wouldn't have the amount of lead preparation to do on a Porsche factory door skin to Factory steel fender.
    Now GRP.... that's a different story.

    Hugh.... can you post a picture of the spare parts list please. I am interested to see the part numbers for the front fender extensions.
    This is the document in French that has all the part numbers. I can't seem to locate mine. Many thanks. Dave

  6. #676
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    Hi Dave
    I am not certain which ones you mean I have the following out of the Gp4 homologation
    Name:  1.png
Views: 986
Size:  158.1 KB
    however I also have this list that is easier to read and maybe a bit more pertinent for the bodywork
    Name:  2.png
Views: 956
Size:  78.1 KB
    and these factory documents about (mainly) the 1972 ST's one of which has part numbers and another covers the "fiberglass issue" in 1972
    Name:  3.jpg
Views: 1003
Size:  91.9 KBName:  4.jpg
Views: 970
Size:  82.6 KBName:  5.jpg
Views: 899
Size:  98.5 KBName:  6.jpg
Views: 925
Size:  43.9 KBName:  7.jpg
Views: 939
Size:  111.6 KBName:  8.jpg
Views: 930
Size:  106.3 KBName:  9.jpg
Views: 965
Size:  35.0 KB
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  7. #677
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,701
    Thanks Hugh, that's perfect. I don't seem to see the steel front fender flare offered.? Maybe i am missing it somehow.?

  8. #678
    2 of the best known factory STs for 72 were the 'Monte' twins, used for rallying mostly. One ended up in So. Africa and there is a wonderful story on this board about that car. Here is a pic of one of them with a crunched left front fender and bent (Strahle) hood which happened in a 72 race, plus another showing the #70 hood with the small crunch in the bottom of the right hand fender. (page 9 of this thread)

    Also, maybe the passenger door was off to get an aluminum skin put on, as was discussed on P. 18 of this thread.
    Attached Images Attached Images     
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  9. #679
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,701
    It's only natural to put steel wings on cars that are doing the tough rallies. The door present in the picture is clearly prepared for lead loading. The factory aluminium door skins as in page 18 are sold in raw aluminium. Not possible to lead load on an aluminium door skin.

  10. #680
    Really enjoy this conversation! I think I'm not the only one. Thank you very much for sharing the different thoughts!

Similar Threads

  1. Ultimate R thread
    By Original Poster in forum General Info
    Replies: 695
    Last Post: 01-06-2024, 01:22 PM
  2. The Ultimate T/R Thread...
    By bob tilton in forum General Info
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 12-05-2023, 01:39 AM
  3. Ultimate Photography knowledge thread
    By Original Poster in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 10:03 AM
  4. Ultimate sport seat thread?
    By advtracing in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2010, 08:47 PM
  5. Ultimate Early Car Airconditioning Thread
    By CamBiscuit in forum General Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-19-2010, 03:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.