Page 109 of 109 FirstFirst ... 95999107108109
Results 1,081 to 1,085 of 1085

Thread: Ultimate ST thread

  1. #1081
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,765
    I think that there was more freedom in interpreting road rules for events such as the Targa Florio and the Acropolis rally than there is these days. Also in Spain i think the cars (illegally) used German Zoll plates for long after they were not allowed to so the cars using those were technically unregistered
    However for some, especially 0550 it was legally registered in Finland and wore the license plate AAV 911 for almost all of its competition history and well after that
    0495 had Stuttgart license plates while at the Acropolis - whether legally or not
    It is correct that the factory documentation stated clearly they were not allowed to be road registered as they did not comply with the appropriate regulations but maybe that was more the Porsche lawyers making sure that the company was not liable if something happened while an owner was driving it on a road
    Here in Australia there used to be an ex werks 908 short tail road registered and there is at least one 917 road registered in Europe and they certainly would not pass the test
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  2. #1082
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    581
    Targa Florio has always been a debate: is it a race or rally? That said group 4 spec (rules were the same for race and rally) was typically the factory playground for most rallies. Group 3 mostly privateer/field filler. With some true rallies even allowing prototypes (Corsica, tour France etc.). Entrance logs show 906, Matra, even a Ferrari 512! Of course the Targa Florio's winners were prototypes with group 4 making top 10. Bottom line, Porsche didn't set the rules; the organizing bodies did.

    For tarmac rallies with good weather, rally-spec was pretty close to full "race spec" for the factories. For Porsche this meant as close to homologated weight as possible, twin plug high butterfly motors etc. for rallies where winning translated into selling cars.

    "Street legal" was in the most marginal sense. Cars really only had to pass muster for transit stages that featured little/no law enforcement. There are stories where drivers were pulled over going way in excess of any posted speed limited ... only to be escorted to their destination by the police while clocking similar speeds. Even behind the iron curtain!

    If one looked at the ford, opel, bmw, Alpine and other works efforts, you would see much more aggressive interpretations than Porsche. These companies always took it much more seriously.

  3. #1083
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Location
    Le Mans
    Posts
    97
    Some cars didn't have a 2.4L badge, most of these cars did.

    I don't really know why some vehicles had the 2.4 badge and others didn't, but I suspect it has something to do with homologation.



    black grille with 2.4L badge : 0022, 0550, 0769, 0827, 0870, 0872, 0909, 0910, 0921, 0934, 0955, 0983, 0987, 1019, 1155, 1417, 1687

    black grille without 2.4L badge : 0041, 0047, 0538, 0818, 0908?, 1195?
    searching gearbox 771 XXXX

    searching engine 6320659
    searching gearbox 7323639

    I'm a photographer too instagram.com/unproshot

  4. #1084
    I apologize for being persistent on this matter, but the vehicles you mentioned, 0550 and 495, were built under the Z-programm and are not "pure" M491 vehicles. Both vehicles, I believe, were delivered on January 14th? Unlike the "pure" M491 vehicles, these two carry the much-discussed S/T inscription, which, in my view, indicates that these vehicles were suitable for rally and circuit use. This program (which combined M471+M491), in my opinion, was the strategy Porsche used to "legally" employ an M491 vehicle under rally or road conditions.
    They developed this program specifically for the cars you mentioned, which bear the ST designation. I assume there are other vehicles you could cite that participated in rallies as pure M491 vehicles; those are the ones that, in this context, seem most relevant.
    Quote Originally Posted by HughH View Post
    230 0495 at the 1972 Acropolis and other Greek and Turkish rallies in 1972
    230 0538 arguably a track car but also at 1972 Targa Florio rally
    230 0550 did some track events but mostly a rally car in Scandinavia - mostly gravel
    230 0983 seems to have done hill climbs
    230 1019 Tour of Spain, Rallye Bosch, Costa de Sol rally, el Ciudad de Oviedo etc
    230 1195 Hill climbs
    230 0769 E40 Zasada's factory owned car mostly rallies
    230 0818 Targa Florio 1972 but more a track car
    230 0870 Targa Florio 1972 but more a track car
    230 0872 Hill Climbs and Targa Florio 1972
    Additionally, in Spain, they used the "Zoll" scheme, allowing these cars to stay on the roads for several months, possibly even a year, which was obviously illegal. As they say, regulations weren't as strict back then. However, it's clear that with certain vehicles, such as the Swiss 1155 and the ones shown by Leirbag, there was an effort to include the rear 2.4L badge. I suppose each country had its own regulations, but internally within Porsche, where the use of an M491 vehicle on public roads had been explicitly prohibited, this differentiation stands out.
    This is why I distinguish between Z-programm vehicles (those bearing the S/T inscription) and "pure" M491 vehicles. I believe this program was Porsche's way of enabling the 2.5L engine vehicle for road use.
    pd:
    Name:  toad.jpg
Views: 47
Size:  56.9 KB
    Last edited by _gonbau; 12-05-2024 at 11:18 AM.

  5. #1085
    Quote Originally Posted by Leirbag View Post
    Some cars didn't have a 2.4L badge, most of these cars did.

    I don't really know why some vehicles had the 2.4 badge and others didn't, but I suspect it has something to do with homologation.



    black grille with 2.4L badge : 0022, 0550, 0769, 0827, 0870, 0872, 0909, 0910, 0921, 0934, 0955, 0983, 0987, 1019, 1155, 1417, 1687

    black grille without 2.4L badge : 0041, 0047, 0538, 0818, 0908?, 1195?
    And 2300495?

Similar Threads

  1. Ultimate R thread
    By Original Poster in forum General Info
    Replies: 700
    Last Post: 07-10-2024, 09:20 AM
  2. The Ultimate T/R Thread...
    By bob tilton in forum General Info
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 12-05-2023, 02:39 AM
  3. Ultimate Photography knowledge thread
    By Original Poster in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 11:03 AM
  4. Ultimate sport seat thread?
    By advtracing in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2010, 09:47 PM
  5. Ultimate Early Car Airconditioning Thread
    By CamBiscuit in forum General Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-19-2010, 04:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.