Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: SWB vs. LWB

  1. #1

    SWB vs. LWB

    Ok, I am not looking for which is better, but I would like to get an honest description of driving characteristics. For those that have owned both what did you like about either models.

    What were the best characteristics between both models.
    S Registry #1280
    1970 911T
    1968 911 FWT
    1965 356 SC

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Vincent, NY
    Posts
    116
    The driving characteristics are different. Porsche lengthened the wheelbase in order to make the car easier to control in turns. Driven both and SWB is a little more squirrely. The rest is looks and part availability. LWB seems to have more available. 68 is worst for parts as interior has some stuff that is that year only.
    1968 911S 30K miles
    2006 Saturn Ion DD
    1988 Beretta GT
    1981 5-Ton Chevy stake-bed

    Air goes in and out, blood goes round and round, any variation of this is a bad thing.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by docrodg View Post
    68 is worst for parts as interior has some stuff that is that year only.
    So is some of the exterior, if I am not mistaken. Plus there are changes within the MY.

    I purchased 2 69 cars as I felt the "systems" were better. I have not owned both but I have driven a SWB car a little - I like the LWB - but it also could be a particular car - my 2 69's are night and day difference because of the way they are set up - improved vs. stock.

    There are a LOT more suspension goodies available to a LWB car simply because more cars were produced with fewer changes.
    Don
    912 Registry Charter Member #68

    Flo - 69 912 Targa - Champagne Yellow
    Jack - 69 912 "R" Coupe - Terrorist Tangerine
    Bill (as in William "Refrigerator" Perry) - 97 E350 Powerstroke - White - (P-car puller deluxe)
    Kermit - 04 John Deere 4310 4WD - is there another color?
    Tony - 60 Buick Invicta 4-door hardtop

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Vincent, NY
    Posts
    116
    Yeah, a little of the exterior. Trust me, having a 68 911S is a pain to find parts for. Mine needs little for restoration, but it seems all of it is NLA.

    LWB models handle better and are easier to find parts for, SWB are rarer and if restored worth more if you care about that (I don't). Ultimately just pick a car you like and can afford and have fun.
    1968 911S 30K miles
    2006 Saturn Ion DD
    1988 Beretta GT
    1981 5-Ton Chevy stake-bed

    Air goes in and out, blood goes round and round, any variation of this is a bad thing.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico
    Posts
    686
    For me it makes no difference. Both can be set up to handle as desired. Both can set up either to over steer or under steer by adjusting/changing anti roll bars. If I had to choose I prefer the SWB they seem to turn in a bit better which is the driving style I prefer. Either will bite you if you lift in a fast corner and either will serve you well.
    Early 911S member #166

    I have no problem with the theory that all men are created equal.
    But after that moment you are on your own and nobody owes you a damn thing.

  6. #6

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by docrodg View Post
    Driven both and SWB is a little more squirrely.

  7. #7
    I like SWB. With later wheels and tires they stick as well as LWB 911s. I think when a LWB 911 rear breaks loose in a turn it is harder to gather it up because it is a quicker transition than with SWB. I think SWB is more predictable in hard cornering. If you have a limited slip differential it will add understeer in turns, LWB will also add to the understeer compared to SWB. I mostly like SWB because they have been given such bad press that the prices have been lower, my kind of car

  8. #8
    They are really not all that different. Yeah, if both are completely stock, you can tell that the SWB will come around a little faster - but that's it. They both drive like a 911!
    Randy Wells
    Automotive Writer/Photographer/Filmmaker
    www.randywells.com/blog
    www.hotrodfilms.com

    Early S Registry #187

  9. #9
    Lighting Specialist jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    4,268
    Quote Originally Posted by a911s View Post
    They are really not all that different. Yeah, if both are completely stock, you can tell that the SWB will come around a little faster - but that's it.
    I'm with Randy. The Stig would probably feel a big difference, but I think it's pretty slight for the rest of us.

    The reason I like '67 SWB's so much is that they somehow remind me a little of 356's. Just a wee bit more primal than the LWB's which are more sophisticated.

    Cheers,
    JohnA
    Lighting Resources for Hardcore Air-Cooled Porsche Enthusiasts”
    ——-
    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    AC Shop: BEST-IN-CLASS Air Cooled 911 Lighting Parts => 911BestInClass.com
    AC Site: The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com
    Instagram: Please Follow => AC Shop Instagram

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Vincent, NY
    Posts
    116
    Yeah, I agree. The SWB models are spartan on luxuries and simple inside. It is not about luxury, it is all about driving.
    1968 911S 30K miles
    2006 Saturn Ion DD
    1988 Beretta GT
    1981 5-Ton Chevy stake-bed

    Air goes in and out, blood goes round and round, any variation of this is a bad thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.