Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: 911T to Kremer ST -questions - suspension

  1. #1
    St-Classic.com advtracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    3,461

    Talking 911T to Kremer ST -questions - suspension

    Before i send off the suspension parts for paint / hpc coating i need to confirm the items i am using will be period correct ( as much as i can ) to match the 1972 #80 kremer ST , based more on factory spec than the genuine car

    - Front axle/a arm mount would be steel not aluminium
    - Front through body sway bar most likely would have been 15 or 16mm ( based on sports purposes 72) although it does refer to large sizes ?
    - Front brake calipers would be standard aluminium "s" unless Kremer used 917 caliper which we may never know ( anyone know)
    -Rear sway bar would be factory 16mm ( again as per sports purposes 72 ) but again was there larger factory sizes ?
    Note ; there is mention of interchangeable front / rear sway bars as such anyone have a photo of what the rear may look like
    -Rear banana arms would have been steel not aluminium and would not have factory bracing (as per later rs / rsr )
    - a arms standard

    i have ref. 69-72 sport purposes data , paul frere's books , bruce anderson's books , parts manuals (69-72)
    John Gausden
    Auckland, New Zealand

    (shipping carson,CA)
    Early911nz.org
    ST-Classic.com
    ST-Classic Facebook
    "Funding my obsession one nut at a time"

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,235

    1972 items

    This may or may not help.

    The 1973 RSR used an aluminum front axle/ A arm mount basically like the 1974 and later street cars used.

    The 1973 RSR used the same sway bars front and rear, like in the publication? The setup also used the same arms front and rear. The drops were the same except for length. The holders for the bars were not the same.They had 18,19,20,21,and 22 mm bars. Most of the parts were fairly simple weldments. The Delran bushings are also the same front and back, of course the bushings inside hole would match the outside diameter of the bar. Its pretty slick and easy to change the bars, I wonder if there would be any real demand for reproductions? I have all the origional parts.
    Mike

  3. #3
    St-Classic.com advtracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    3,461

    Talking

    would you belive that due to the rsr style sway bars being introduced by porsche in 1972 that there is a good chance that kremer would have had access to the parts in early 72 to fit to there ST style car ?

    As Kremer had such a good relationship with porsche it could seen that they would have been the test mule for parts prior to the release of the rs and RSR

    Any chance of a photo of the rear setup or a past link if you have already done so.
    John Gausden
    Auckland, New Zealand

    (shipping carson,CA)
    Early911nz.org
    ST-Classic.com
    ST-Classic Facebook
    "Funding my obsession one nut at a time"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,235

    RSR Sway bar

    John

    The RSR sway bar looks like the regular street bar except that it was generally thicker, 18 to 22mm, and because of this the square ends are approx 1 inch aquare.( I can measure this) Also for the setup there are two parellel pieces of meral welded to the rear suspension arms and the heim joint on the end of the drop goes between them and is secured with a bolt. Here are pictures of the front holder for the sway bar and Delran bushing - the round aluminum thing, the Delran bushing - bad picture. The arms, same front and back. Also a picture of the rear sway bar holder, again the same Delran bushing fits in this holder. The rear holders bolt to the standred street sway bar bracket. The drops are just an aluminum rod, approx 3/8 in dia. with a hole drilled in each end, into the bar and taped with right and left hand threads and fitted with a hein joint fitting. I can give you pictures and measurements of everything, I put these up since I had them now.You cannot see it because of the poor picture but the Delran bushing is split along its length so it can be removed very easily.
    Attached Images Attached Images     
    Mike

  5. #5
    St-Classic.com advtracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    3,461

    Talking

    so i believe that Gib used a modified tarrett engineering rear bar on his ST Creation , so i would asume that he was following this rsr design as it does look very similar.
    We could conclude that it is very likley kremer used this and it was availible ( according to the sports purposes manual) ?
    John Gausden
    Auckland, New Zealand

    (shipping carson,CA)
    Early911nz.org
    ST-Classic.com
    ST-Classic Facebook
    "Funding my obsession one nut at a time"

  6. #6
    John:

    Kremer might have used adjustable levers like the RSRs in 72, but don't know for sure. They would have been looking for adjustability to get better handling, so it is likely they used something like the RSR units to control under/oversteer. I think Edmund Harris told me that Kremer used 906 or 908 brakes on the front. Factory steel trailing arms would have been used I think.

    Gib
    Gib Bosworth
    EarlySReg 434
    R Gruppe 17

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,235

    Kremer Bros

    I may be way off base, since I do not know if the Kremers are still alive, but why not call them and ask? Or get someone who knows them and ask them to talk to them?Most of the Porsche guys are very helpful and maybe they are also?
    Mike

  8. #8
    John,

    I disassembled the suspension on 230 0495 and it looked like it had never been apart. It still had factory rubber bushings throughout, just like a street car. Front torsion bar 19mm, rear 23mm. Aluminum front calipers,steel rear. 15mm rear sway bar. I don't have the front (through the body bar) with me, but I can check, 16mm I think. The rear sway bar supports are reinforced and thats about it. All street stuff from that time period.

    Matt

  9. #9
    St-Classic.com advtracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    3,461

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Blast View Post
    John,

    I disassembled the suspension on 230 0495 and it looked like it had never been apart. It still had factory rubber bushings throughout, just like a street car. Front torsion bar 19mm, rear 23mm. Aluminum front calipers,steel rear. 15mm rear sway bar. I don't have the front (through the body bar) with me, but I can check, 16mm I think. The rear sway bar supports are reinforced and thats about it. All street stuff from that time period.

    Matt
    Thanks matt, just what i needed to know ,i was going through the CD of photos of yours for clues but of course the car is mostly stripped at that time . For the 72 year ( being a change over period ) it is quite up in the air with what was used unless you have a genuine car to work off . Yours definitely must be one of the rare one's that still has a good proportion of original fit out
    John Gausden
    Auckland, New Zealand

    (shipping carson,CA)
    Early911nz.org
    ST-Classic.com
    ST-Classic Facebook
    "Funding my obsession one nut at a time"

  10. #10
    St-Classic.com advtracing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Auckland , New Zealand
    Posts
    3,461

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by varunan123 View Post
    John


    Here is some info from a prior discussion.Matt could you post pictures of the underside of your car for the rears.

    Raj


    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...=23333&page=18
    Thanks raj, i had looked and download that info off that thread and as such i am following the photo layout with reinforcing the original style sway bar mount , but what made me question the type of rear sway was the ref. in the 71-72 sports purposes manual and ref in 2 of paul frere's books to " interchangeable sway bars ..." which made me think would kremer use it if it was available?
    I may get my existing rear hpc coated anyway and if i use an rsr style instead there is no great loss
    John Gausden
    Auckland, New Zealand

    (shipping carson,CA)
    Early911nz.org
    ST-Classic.com
    ST-Classic Facebook
    "Funding my obsession one nut at a time"

Similar Threads

  1. Swb suspension questions
    By andrea70 in forum General Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-03-2013, 07:31 AM
  2. 911T to Kremer ST -questions
    By advtracing in forum General Info
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-28-2010, 10:54 PM
  3. Suspension rebuilt questions ...
    By RS-GT in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-24-2008, 12:46 PM
  4. Suspension questions
    By CamBiscuit in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-14-2008, 04:28 AM
  5. Suspension questions
    By CamBiscuit in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-28-2007, 12:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.