Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 1967 Soft Window S: $79,000; Opinions wanted

  1. #1
    Senior Member Macroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,231

    1967 Soft Window S: $79,000; Opinions wanted

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1967-...ht_4998wt_1167

    Have values fallen this low or am I missing an obvious defect?
    86 Sport Purpose Carrera "O4"

  2. #2
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574

    Ventura

    That car was at Ventura 2 weeks ago. Very nice !
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  3. #3
    Senior Member Macroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,231

    Buying Opportunity?

    Within the last two years 4 number matching softies traded over $100,000 w/ a high of $150,000 for a perfect low mileage car out of the bay area. If this car is indeed as Curt stated "very nice" and he has seen enough to know, do we have a reflection of an adjusted marketplace or a buying opportunity?

    How would this car grade out? Say in relation to the Hopkins/Cabel softie?
    86 Sport Purpose Carrera "O4"

  4. #4
    Luke,

    I sent you an email.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Macroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,231
    "This S is numbers matching, rust-free and collision-free."


    Ok mystery solved, non-matching number despite ebay ad proclaiming different. This is the car sold a couple of years ago out of the east. Price is more reflective of value considering the car.
    86 Sport Purpose Carrera "O4"

  6. #6
    Senior Member BBausser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sutalle, Ga.
    Posts
    913
    It looks very nice but it is missing some easilly fixed details which may lead to possible other details which would surface in a personal inspection. The engine decals are wrong. It's missing the wiper arms and blades. The paint under the engine grill is not satin black. I suspect a lot of other details may be incorrect also.
    Currently:
    67 3.6 Rocket "Silver"
    62 T6 Outlaw Coupe "ole Yellow"
    65 F100 Custom Cab Flairside Shortbed

    Gone but not forgotten in last 2 years:
    67S Concours King
    67 912 Vintage Racer
    68 912 Flipper
    83 911SC
    93 Mo30 968

    too many cars before that

    Early S Registry # 787
    R Gruppe # 551

    "its better to wear out then rust out"

  7. #7
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574

    1968 vs-1967

    Quote Originally Posted by Macroni View Post
    Within the last two years 4 number matching softies traded over $100,000 w/ a high of $150,000 for a perfect low mileage car out of the bay area. If this car is indeed as Curt stated "very nice" and he has seen enough to know, do we have a reflection of an adjusted marketplace or a buying opportunity?

    How would this car grade out? Say in relation to the Hopkins/Cabel softie?
    Main disparity in price IMHO:

    1. 1968S SWT VS 1967S SWT ( How many 1968's do you see here?)

    2. The Rick Cabell "star-power" with the quality of his restorations

    I, see the SWT's being the next Speedsters when it comes to being the sexy Porsche to have
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  8. #8
    Beautiful car.

    Only question:

    Those lovely seats have plugs for head rest bayonets, and appear to be R and L (not both L as on 67) indicating that the seats are not '67 sports. Does the CoA indicate that this was originally a sport seat optioned car?
    Early 911S Registry
    Looking for engine 960 168
    Looking for gear box 103 165

  9. #9
    Senior Member tfmcmahon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tucson,AZ
    Posts
    648

    vague

    As per the seats, the ad said,"mostly original". Is that Frank G`s old car?
    Member:S Registry #864

  10. #10
    Senior Member Macroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,231
    Quote Originally Posted by tfmcmahon View Post
    As per the seats, the ad said,"mostly original". Is that Frank G`s old car?
    It appears so.....
    86 Sport Purpose Carrera "O4"

Similar Threads

  1. 1967 soft window 911
    By mcgregor in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2012, 05:57 AM
  2. 1967 soft window f/s
    By 78mochasc in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-31-2011, 01:57 PM
  3. FS: 1967 911s Soft Window
    By mrbmw2002 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 09:58 AM
  4. Wanted - Soft Window setup
    By VintageExcellen in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2008, 09:29 AM
  5. Opinions on the collectability of soft Window Targas
    By pu911rsr in forum General Info
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-04-2006, 05:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.