Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 1973.5 All Origianl Viper Green T

  1. #1

    1973.5 All Origianl Viper Green T

    Original paint beauty. $39,500 neg. Please see my site http://www.Porsport.com for pictures. Please contact me direct 631 786 6511 or DAhearn67@gmail.com Thanks guys.

    Don

  2. #2
    I have seen this car in person and can vouch for Don's description. As a matter of fact, if my business wasn't suffering through our economic malaise this car wouldn't even be for sale right now but would be safely tucked away in my garage.

    Here are only some of the pictures Don has posted on his site right now. I know he's a bit of a 'techno-phobe' so I'll lend a helping hand:








  3. #3
    That color seems very light for Viper green. Was it re-painted a bit lighter than the oem color.
    John

    Early 911 S Registry member 473
    RGruppe member 445

  4. #4
    Senior Member 210bhp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    2,051
    Conda?

    Regards
    Mike
    RS#1551(sold)
    67S
    73E (home after 25 years) and sold again
    Early S reg. #681

  5. #5
    Senior Member vipergruen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Milan, Italy
    Posts
    801
    This is something I noticed with the photos of my 2.4S, the rendering of viper green on digital is very difficult and sometimes depends from light and the camera used.
    I have dozens of photos of my car with this rendering, which is different form the real one...

    Andrea
    Andrea
    Early S registry #1082

  6. #6
    Thanks for your help Mike. Guys as I have stated the car is original paint. The digital pictures may be a little off but it is Viper green and all original. Thanks.

    Don

  7. #7
    The 2nd place on this panel has no decal on a '73. Here's the re-touched photo of the car for proof. In Don's case, a previous owner found it a handy location to advertise that the car has KONI shocks.

    Tom
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  8. #8
    Very nice car...wish I had mine back!

    Both Conda and Viper green are very difficult to photograph properly. You have to play with the white balance settings on your camera.

    This is the best I could do with my '70 Conda.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #9
    aka techweenie Eminence Gris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,099
    Viper is notoriously hard to photograph.

    Best picture of Viper Green I've ever gotten was on cellphone camera. And it's not Viper at all. The color is a Saleen exclusive called "Sour Grapefruit."

    From SEMA last week.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    techweenie.com

    My parts fetcher: 2016 Tesla S | Currently building: 73 RSR tribute and 69 RS tribute

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminence Gris View Post
    Viper is notoriously hard to photograph.

    Best picture of Viper Green I've ever gotten was on cellphone camera. And it's not Viper at all. The color is a Saleen exclusive called "Sour Grapefruit."

    From SEMA last week.

    Where's the car?

Similar Threads

  1. 300hp 1973 Viper Green RS
    By Macroni in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 09-24-2011, 07:14 AM
  2. Conda Green or Viper Green w/ Tan Part 2
    By rpsurfr in forum General Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2010, 02:14 PM
  3. 1973.5 Original Viper Green T Coupe
    By Rennman in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-28-2009, 06:29 AM
  4. Viper Green & Radium Green!!
    By Zithlord in forum General Info
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-24-2007, 09:33 PM
  5. Signal Green vs. Viper or Conda Green
    By Richard in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-27-2005, 06:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.