Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Anyone on here used these 901 gear ratios ?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,694

    Anyone on here used these 901 gear ratios ?

    A, E, J, Q, X ?

    How would this set-up be for a (mainly) street-driven car ?

    A few more details:

    A = 11:34

    E = 17:34

    J = 21:31

    Q = 24:27

    X = 28:24

    The transmission would be mated to my 2.5 litre twin-plug (90mm x 66mm) engine.
    Andy

    Early 911S Reg #753
    R Gruppe #105

  2. #2
    Andy,

    Whats your powerband like? I can put it on my spreadsheet and give you some ideas (give me HP and Tq figures).

    You are going with pretty low ratios IMHO. It depends on your type of driving.
    Juan - Member # 321
    Ft. Lauderdale

    Mission Foods Porsche GT3 Cup USA Champion
    Klub Sport Champion
    Rolex Endurance Champion
    Louis Chevrolet Endurance Champion
    HSR Sprint Champion
    PCA Club Race Champion

    Race cars and parts for sale; videos and photos at: www.alteregoracing.com

    "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." -Sir Winston Churchill

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,694
    Thanks Juan - I think I've probably got the same spreadsheet but don't really understand how to interpret it !

    I haven't had the engine dynoed recently (I've made a number of changes since the last run) but these were the figures:

    Power(bhp)/Torque(lbs.ft)

    4500rpm - 156/182

    5000rpm - 175/185

    5500rpm - 190/181

    6000rpm - 204/179

    6500rpm - 212/171

    7000rpm - 216/162

    Maximum power = 217bhp @ 7400rpm (154 lbs.ft torque)

    Maximum torque = 186 lbs.ft @ 5200rpm
    Andy

    Early 911S Reg #753
    R Gruppe #105

  4. #4
    I tend to look at gear ratios in relation to the difference from stock but as Juan stated, the setup really depends on your power band. Equal spacing is probably something to consider but I'm no expert so take that with a grain of salt.

    A E J Q X is: -1, -4, -2, stock

    I've owned a car with the A E I O U box and it's pretty slick but has no top end speed. That wasn't the nature as it was designed for short circuits.

    A E I O U is: -1, -3, -3. -1

    I'm not a fan of the early cars tendency to be light in the front end so I'd be perfectly happy with less top end.

    A E K Q V is : -1 -2 -2 -2 I have this gear set. I know that it served a good friend well in his auto-X car. Top end is not a consideration.

    Good luck,

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  5. #5
    Andy,

    I assume you are running a 7:31 final drive and 225/50/15 rears?

    juan at alteregoracing.com
    Juan - Member # 321
    Ft. Lauderdale

    Mission Foods Porsche GT3 Cup USA Champion
    Klub Sport Champion
    Rolex Endurance Champion
    Louis Chevrolet Endurance Champion
    HSR Sprint Champion
    PCA Club Race Champion

    Race cars and parts for sale; videos and photos at: www.alteregoracing.com

    "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." -Sir Winston Churchill

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sonoma, CA
    Posts
    376

    Post Gear Splits

    Actually you want to have your 4/5 step to have the smallest RPM drop and your 1/2 the greatest. As the road speed increases you are facing greater parasitic loss of power from wind resistance and on the opposite end the gearsets with the highest reduction are the most fragile and should be used least. In a perfect world one would use the difference between peak torque and peak horsepower as a guide. In this case 2,200 RPM. The 1->2 shift would exceed this (say 2,500, 2600 RPM Drop). In most 901 boxes the killer is the 2->3 step. It's too big and acceleration bogs momentarialy (that's where the Alfa GTV's and Lotus Cortinas pull me between turns #2 & #3 at Sears Point every time!).

    Just staring at the ceiling and relying heavily on SWAG I'd think something like-
    1/2 = 2,500 RPM drop
    2/3 = 2,200 RPM drop
    3/4 = 1,900 to 2,200 RPM drop
    4/5 = 1,400 to 1,600 RPM drop

    This is very dependent on rear axle ratio and rear tire size. Bigger od tires or higher ratio (6:31) would call for narrower splits and smaller od or the 7:31 ratio would accept or need larger larger splits.

    Then you have to consider top speed and on a road car, cruising speed. One can get ratios that maximize acceleration and make your upshifts sound like a F1 car and then run out of gears at 110 mph or end up trying to cruise at 75 or 80 hand then listen to the engine pounding along at 4500-5000 RPM's all day. The noise becomes physically tiring.

    For a road car 5th gear has to be able to cruise and give the desired top speed so one would pick this one first and then work backward. And the problem will probably be 2nd gear. Unless you're ready to buy a 904 mainshaft, there is a limited number of 2nd gear options available. Certainly the part books list many 2nd gear options but when you check for availability you will discover that actually few of the ratios listed were made. Don't forget to look at 912 and 914 ratios to expand the options. For racing in the states (generally shorter tracks and lower speeds) old timers swear by the "Vowel Box" (A:E:I:O:U).

    Hope this helps rather than confuses.

    johnt

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,694
    Thanks for the comments so far guys ...

    Juan - yes, final drive is 7:31 but rear tyres will probably be 215/60 x 15
    Andy

    Early 911S Reg #753
    R Gruppe #105

  8. #8
    I would think 2nd and 3rd would be too short (I'd sell that fancy 904 mainshaft and gear, it's not worth it for one ratio). I'm running A F J O S in my 2.0L. Whatever you decide, I would recommed getting perfect splits 1st through 4th and then a cruiser 5th. I've found that all of my fun on the street happens between 30 and 90, and I just want some quiet on the freeway trip home from Treffen.
    Tom F.

    '67 911S Slate Gray
    '70 911T 2.8 hotrod (in progress)
    '92 964

    #736

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by tfiv View Post
    I would think 2nd and 3rd would be too short (I'd sell that fancy 904 mainshaft and gear, it's not worth it for one ratio). I'm running A F J O S in my 2.0L. Whatever you decide, I would recommed getting perfect splits 1st through 4th and then a cruiser 5th. I've found that all of my fun on the street happens between 30 and 90, and I just want some quiet on the freeway trip home from Treffen.
    And you get that "quiet" with an S 5th !
    Early 911S member #166

    I have no problem with the theory that all men are created equal.
    But after that moment you are on your own and nobody owes you a damn thing.

  10. #10

    Gear Chart




    1st to 2nd 2836rpm

    2nd to 3rd 2085rpm

    3rd to 4th 1893rpm

    4th to 5th 1632rpm

Similar Threads

  1. 71 901 transmission ratios from a T to an S?
    By Rino71 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2012, 07:56 PM
  2. How to figure out gear ratios without opening the box?
    By Cornpanzer in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 04:41 PM
  3. is there a list of trans codes + ratios ?
    By Maybe-68S-Targa in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 07:33 PM
  4. Gear Ratios For a SWB
    By jaudette3 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 07:41 PM
  5. Steering Ratios
    By RTincher in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 07:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.