Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: '69S vs. other 2.0L clutch disc

  1. 12-14-2009, 03:41 PM #1
    John Straub
    John Straub is offline
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184

    '69S vs. other 2.0L clutch disc

    Does anyone out there know, what the difference in thickness between a '69S clutch disc and a standard 2.0L clutch disc?

    Thanks,
    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-14-2009, 04:52 PM #2
    greens
    greens is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Northern FL
    Posts
    172
    69S disk is 6.5mm vs the normal one which has about a 9mm thickness.
    Jim Lonsdale
    Member #80
    60 356 Coupe (First Car $400!)
    61 356 Coupe (Gone)
    62 356 Cabriolet (Gone)
    69 911 S
    70 914-6 (Gone)
    70 911S (Gone)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-14-2009, 06:02 PM #3
    davep
    davep is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,242
    Yup, that is about correct. I was measuring one the other day for a prospective purchaser. The thickness was mentioned to be about 7mm in another post, and I could get less than that without pinching the disc. If the disc were to be compressed (there is a spring between the friction layers) it would probably be about 6.5mm.

    Need one?
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-14-2009, 06:19 PM #4
    John Straub
    John Straub is offline
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184
    I may...not sure yet. Thanks for the info guys!!!

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Sachs Clutch Disc from 73E
    By Bobby Smith in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2013, 10:35 AM
  2. NOS 901 Sachs Clutch Disc
    By 9seriesguy in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-26-2010, 08:59 AM
  3. clutch disc question
    By 66S in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 09:37 AM
  4. WTB: '69S Clutch Disc
    By John Straub in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-15-2009, 03:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.