Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: CFM flow for a 911S head ?

  1. #1

    CFM flow for a 911S head ?

    Is there a source for this information ? I would specifically like to know what a Stock 2.2 S head would flow.

    Thanks

    G
    1971 911E
    1964 26R (narrow arch)
    1965 26 GTS ( sold to fund 911E restoration)
    1965 912 ( sold to pay for 26R head)

  2. #2
    Senior Member CamBiscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    1,447
    Some useful info in this thread - http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...highlight=porn
    Looking for engine # 6208151
    '74 RS 3.0 Replica
    '70 911E Bahia Red (SOLD)
    '71 911 S/T Replica 2.3 Twin plug BEAST (SOLD)
    Australian TYP 901 Register #78
    Early S Registry # 1076

  3. #3
    Thanks Cam,

    I did a search before posting and came up empty handed - by the chart it looks like a stock 2.2 S head will flow 225 CFM at .5" lift - that's pretty darn good not sure I would CNC for the extra 5% I have built other engines of the same vintage that don't flow as well relative to figures above, yet have better yields over all ...

    So , being new to the engine family what are biggest challenges in making the engine produce power ? Is it CR ? combustion chamber shape ? Are you hard up against the law of diminishing returns once you go past the factory's S specification - In other words it cheaper to go faster by taking weight off the car rather then go into the motor...

    Sorry for being long winded.

    George
    1971 911E
    1964 26R (narrow arch)
    1965 26 GTS ( sold to fund 911E restoration)
    1965 912 ( sold to pay for 26R head)

  4. #4
    Im not a pro engine builder but I think the s is the most compromise that you would want to drive on the street.The factory full race versions have twin plugs to allow more compression ,bigger cams and bigger valves and bigger carbs/throttle bodies for circuit racing that were even too wild for rally applications.Some of the gains(minor) that my engine builder(for off road 1600vws)is getting in this old engine formula is from technology that was not available at the time ie aerospace coatings, lighter valves ,managing harmonics on a dyno.all pretty expensive stuff that is a trial and error process. Best of luck I look forward to other responses! S

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: 1969 911S cylinder head
    By endo911rs in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-17-2013, 07:33 AM
  2. MFI air flow at 300RPM
    By bliebler in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-02-2011, 04:13 PM
  3. 2.4 911S piston and 2.2 911S head compatability
    By Neil '67 911S in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 06:40 PM
  4. Oil Flow Rate
    By CSP-Will in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 07:07 PM
  5. '67 911S Head
    By 911split in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-17-2004, 11:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.