Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Carrera RS Lightweight . . .

  1. #1
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,371

    Carrera RS Lightweight . . .

    . . . . at Fantasy Junction:

    http://www.fantasyjunction.com/cars/...tre%20Flat%206

    VIN = 9113601079
    (numbers matching)
    White w/blue exterior, black interior
    53721 Kms
    'New Pricing!'
    $345k
    Sale pending

    Rick Kreiskott

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  2. #2
    Are those auminum door sill plates correct? Not looking to buy just wondering. Thanks

  3. #3
    Aluminum*. Sorry

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    439
    Yes they are.

  5. #5
    Look at what it sold for in 2002...

    http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...1&aid=42&pop=0
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  6. #6
    makes you wonder just where the ceiling is....... i guess the recession is over

  7. #7
    Senior Member Vintage Racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    15 Year Member, Sandy Springs, GA
    Posts
    614
    Quote Originally Posted by 72targa View Post
    Look at what it sold for in 2002...
    Wow, thanks for the link.

  8. #8
    I thought RS lightweights are NOT supposed to have undercoating in the engine bay to save weight. This car clearly has it and it looks like the original factory undercoating that would normally be on touring RSs and regular early 911s. Can someone explain if this is supposed to be incorrect/correct?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    This RS was produced after the homologation process (roughly the first 1000 cars) was complete so it was produced in the same manner as all the other production models, ie with full undercoating. Sparse undercoating was only used on the homologation models. These were then later converted into the model that customer had ordered, both M471 and M472. There were a handful of homologation models that were left uncoverted.

    The sparse undercoating was applied prior to paint so eventually both lightweight and Touring models would basically have very little undercoating if they were produced during the homologation process.

    I see one of the previous owners is a member here.
    Last edited by fryardds; 05-27-2011 at 06:37 PM.
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  10. #10
    Just out of interest I was always under the impression that the RS in either touring and/or lightweight spec was never officially imported into the US in 72/3.
    If that was the case, what was the legal situation for those who brought them in as private imports, what if any modifications had to be done to get them on the road?
    cheers, Mike
    Member#1664
    1972 911 S/RSR to Martini Prototype specification
    http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15294

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Porsche 911 RS Carrera Lightweight
    By 67er911S in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-31-2014, 02:10 AM
  2. WTB: 1973 Carrera RS lightweight M471, first or second series
    By mike66 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 11:53 AM
  3. 1973 Porsche Carrera RS Lightweight at Mohlman
    By 72targa in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-17-2012, 11:49 AM
  4. Carrera RS Lightweight seats?
    By jim schrager in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-09-2006, 05:51 AM
  5. RHD Carrera RS 2.7 M471 'Lightweight'
    By nick-moss in forum General Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-22-2003, 07:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.