Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Mainshaft (GA) from 65 box - OK with 2.0s?

  1. #1
    Member #1525 gilbert911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    359

    Mainshaft (GA) from 65 box - OK with 2.0s?

    As the title says.
    Have a GA mainshaft sourced from an early 65 911 box.
    Should it be robust enough to be mated with a 901/02 2.0s stock engine?
    Tyres are skinny at 5.5"
    No LSD

    I have read that the imput shaft is not as strong (1st gear) as the later boxes. Would I be correct in this and should I be concerned?
    Suppose the alt would be seperate mainshaft and GA gear, but expensive.

    Thanks for advice

  2. #2
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,208
    I have one and have never had a problem.

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741

  3. #3
    GA second is not a 2,0 liter gear, it's a 2,2. AGAOVZA 70-71 only.

    It's fine with a 2,0 S

    The problem is that first isn't as strong because it's cantilevered off the end of the mainshaft inside the end cover. If you have a 3,0 motor and hammer first it will pull the gear off the end of the shaft.

    No concern about doing that with a 2,0 S
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  4. #4
    Member #1525 gilbert911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    359
    Getting alot of help from you John!
    Thanks again

    Chris N

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,270
    The GA mainshaft came in the first 911 transmissions in 1965 models (type 901/0), and also appeared in several other types later on such as the 914/01. It had a 12mm nut securing first gear in the 1965 version. Later mainshafts had a 14mm nut instead. As long as the transmission is lightly loaded it should be fine. If you have questions, then I suggest contacting Grady Clay for definitive information on these early mainshafts.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  6. #6
    I think you would like the performance of your car with the lower F shaft a 2.0 came with
    Tom F.

    '67 911S Slate Gray
    '70 911T 2.8 hotrod (in progress)
    '92 964

    #736

Similar Threads

  1. FS: 901 GA mainshaft
    By Brant in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-28-2013, 01:05 PM
  2. FS: NOS 904 Mainshaft
    By Mr9146 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-10-2012, 11:33 AM
  3. GA Mainshaft
    By jhora in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-26-2008, 07:49 PM
  4. NOS 904 mainshaft FS
    By lisa_spyder in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 12:50 PM
  5. WTB 904 mainshaft
    By ixxifan in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.