View Poll Results: Carbs or MFI?

Voters
132. You may not vote on this poll
  • Carburetors

    40 30.30%
  • Mechanical Fuel Injection

    90 68.18%
  • Other

    2 1.52%
Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 113

Thread: POLL: Carbs or MFI?

  1. #11
    Senior Member kentf14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,914
    I agree with Allen. If your the car originally came with MFI, it looks like the folks here try to stick with originality. I have had 2 hotrod engines in the past however and both had Webers (40 or 46).
    I love the MFI and if I could build my dream hotrod motor it would have some high butterfly or slide valve injection. Then again, I really like how "raw" the transitions can be with carbs. Popping and spitting raw-ness.
    That said, my 2.4 has the original MFI and will stay that way.

    Kent
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by kentf14; 12-18-2010 at 06:34 PM.
    E911SR & RGRUPPE
    '65 911 "The Ol' Gal" (long gone)
    '73 S Coupe #306

  2. #12
    I'd rather have the MFI. Also have a car with Webers and it's really a PITA even though they were rebuilt etc. I certainly wouldn't change out to Webers. Finding someone who really knows MFI these days is rare.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Flieger View Post
    And the other was Marco's 911ST project. I bet those were the only two early cars there. The rest were water cooled, right? That is the way PCA-SBR seems to be going.

    The early cars, and especially the ones with MFI, must be out driving and too busy for the concours.
    No, Max, the ST had a 2.9L with Webbers.

    The best thing about MFI is that, for the most part, it's like a Ronco product ... just set it and forget it. It's turn key, virtually bulletproof, not as susceptable to environmental conditions as carburetors and it looks cool as hell. Yes, it's expensive to "buy in" if you're building/restoring and MFI system, but the price of admission is more than justified, in my opinion.

    My decision to go with carburetors on my current project has a lot to do with the fact that the car originally came with Webbers, as well as the fact that I need the practice tuning carbs. I spent the money to have Matt at Eurometrix recondition my carburetors, so once they're tuned they'll probably be as perfect as they ever could be ... until it gets hot out or I decide to go up Angeles Crest Highway.

    Mechanical fuel injection rules the vintage Porsche roost.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  4. #14
    Which car? Euro Carrera = MFI. My 2 911Ts, both have carbs (one has been weberized); the hotrod has Haltech/ITBs, and the SWB Race car has PMOs. One of the two 911Ts will eventually have MFI though...
    Early S Reg #1809

  5. #15
    Senior Member aporschaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    364
    One of the single best things I did to my E was to locate restore and install the MFI system. The Solexes I had on my car had nothing on the original MFI.
    "He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire."

    1971 911e
    1978 911sc Targa (Sold)
    1973 911 RSR (Clone)

  6. #16
    Senior Member t6dpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    2,279
    Carbs on the hotrod, but want want want MFI. Someday maybe...
    Scott H.
    1969 Coupe LtWt
    1973.5 911T

  7. #17
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,371

    Results, so Far . . .

    . . . . 5-to-1, MFI in front.

    I guess I was expecting that the MFI Guys would step up, be counted --- but I wasn't trying to scare off the Carb Guys.

    I can appreciate the what it takes to keep any 40-some-year-old stock induction system running and working properly. Plus, as has been mentioned, any engine work done over the intervening four decades is probably better handled with one option versus the other.

    But, regardless of any opinions --- one way or the other --- and regardless of what induction set-up any car originally came with --- and this is definitely NOT about right/wrong, good/bad, original/modified, or anything like that --- I'm genuinely curious . . .

    . . . what's the Carb-versus-MFI distribution in The Early 911S Registry.

    Rick Kreiskott
    Last edited by LongRanger; 12-17-2010 at 02:31 PM.

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by SrfCity View Post
    Finding someone who really knows MFI these days is rare.
    I remember that someone (Sherwood Lee, I believe) put together a list of "MFI Resources" and posted it somewhere on the Early S Registry site (not the forums). This included people who really know MFI.

    It used to be on the Registry Home Page, but I can't seem to find it anymore....
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  9. #19
    I know there is the thread on Pelican. I will get it for you.

    I know of Gus Pfister, Mark Jung, Mat Blast, and I think it is Aaron Burnham at Rennworks who Kundensport uses.

    TLG Auto set up the MFI on my car.
    Last edited by Flieger; 12-17-2010 at 04:31 PM.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  10. #20
    Actually, it appears there is not a list of technicians on here. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...es-thread.html
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

Similar Threads

  1. Poll: Who Has a Kardex for Their Car?
    By LongRanger in forum General Info
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 05:32 PM
  2. Member age poll
    By kenikh in forum General Info
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 10:46 AM
  3. POLL/CENSUS: What's Your Lid? . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-01-2013, 03:28 PM
  4. Poll on '67S ????
    By 69Sman in forum General Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 12:23 PM
  5. Speed TV poll.. Get out the vote
    By super9064 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.