View Poll Results: Carbs or MFI?

Voters
132. You may not vote on this poll
  • Carburetors

    40 30.30%
  • Mechanical Fuel Injection

    90 68.18%
  • Other

    2 1.52%
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 113

Thread: POLL: Carbs or MFI?

  1. #21
    I bought it as a roller, engine out, tranny out, but numbers matching. It came without the intake/MFI bits and I expect that was due to the infamous cold-start/fire starter system. During the resto process, I searched long and hard to find the correct parts and rebuild them for this 71E................ This is my 1st MFI....I like it!
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Al Kosmal
    the X-faktory
    Current projects; 69-911.5
    76S rat bastard---off to Germany

    1970 914-4...off to Wisconsin
    73 911X Cafe Racer...........(off to S.F.....now racing in Germany)
    66 912 ...off to France
    71E 9111200979 ( gone to Paris..then to Corsica)
    77S (off to NY)
    Early S #1240

    RGruppe #669
    www.x-faktory.com

  2. #22
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,690
    Mine is MFI from new but for the last 12 years or so has the RS space cam to go with the 2.7 barrels and pistons and E cams

    I echo the need to have someone who really knows the system to look after it properly (thankfully I have - thanks Mike) but when it is working well it is fantastic.

    Another thing that gets overlooked (but shouldn't be if you read check-measure-adjust) is that ALL the parts of the system need to be in good order to get the best out of MFI.

    I recently noticed the difference when I had my throttle bodies redone and taken out to S spec. It turned out that there were small air leaks on the face of the throttle bodies where they meet the engine as well as the usual wear in the butterflies etc and a couple of clogged air holes. I knew that we had to do the throttle bodies because it was hard to get the engine to idle smoothly and we had to set the MFI richer than optimal to counter the airleaks - I just did not realize how much effect that the worn throttle bodies were having.

    The difference when the engine was put back together is amazing - it will idle smoothly down to below 500rpm (although it is now set above that) and is extremely responsive and smooth in power delivery from there right up to 7300 redline. I cant remember any other maintenance fix (including rebuilding the MFI pump) that has produced such a marked change in the responsiveness and smoothness of running. My mechanic says it is now so smooth that it feels like EFI instead of MFI!
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  3. #23
    MFI IS a great system when the major elements are working right and not worn. IMHO, a lot of pumps have been rebuilt unnecessarily when what was really needed was to rebuild the throttle bodies which do wear for sure. That is not to say if you are going from 2.4 to 2.7 you don't need a new space cam..you do. My '72 had about 77k miles and the throttle bodies were worn. Back then I had Eurometrix, which at that time was located in Campbell CA, rebuild my throttle bodies. Engine ran great and back then, our cars had to pass tough California emissions and mine did...however it did need some tweeking to get it in spec.
    A challenge to ANY MFI system rebuild is a. cost and b. the fact that it needs to be matched to the engine can't easily, like Webers for example, be modified to match a hotrod engine. High butteflies and Slide-valves on the other hand are, also, totally cool but best suited for race-type engines. Not to mention, expensive! All this IMHO. Thanks.

    -Allen-

  4. #24
    Rick, I have two 72 S's both with MFI, only way to fly!!
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Posts
    401
    Well, I always seem to find myself in the minority camp and this time will be no different. The first motor I built was my hot rod 2.5 with PMO's. And having never dialed in a porsche engine of any sorts before I felt PMO's were going to be the best choice for a newbie. And they have proven to be the best choice in my opinion. Once I worked through the normal tuning issues . . . fuel pressure, float bowl fuel level, idle jets, main jets, venturis . . . I love them. I know exactly how to tune them based on the results I want to get. Bigger mains and venturis and the motor pulls like a freight train all the way to the rev-limiter . . . or step down a size on both and it's the best daily driver a guy could ask for. And all this can all be done by me (a rookie, backyard mechanic) in a matter of a couple hours with predictable results. BTW, I also just completed a 2.7 RS spec. build with MFI . . . and yeah, MFI is a different beast. But for now (at least until the MFI is dial in) for the thrill of driving . . . I prefer the 2.5 with carbs.
    Tom Ching
    69E Burgundy

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    MFI

    From back in the day (circa mid 70's) and currently.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    And on the other steed brought to you by Matt Blast and Gus.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  8. #28
    Senior Member BBausser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sutalle, Ga.
    Posts
    913
    Nothing wrong with PMO's
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Currently:
    67 3.6 Rocket "Silver"
    62 T6 Outlaw Coupe "ole Yellow"
    65 F100 Custom Cab Flairside Shortbed

    Gone but not forgotten in last 2 years:
    67S Concours King
    67 912 Vintage Racer
    68 912 Flipper
    83 911SC
    93 Mo30 968

    too many cars before that

    Early S Registry # 787
    R Gruppe # 551

    "its better to wear out then rust out"

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    4
    My '73 911S still has it's MFI. The injection pump was 'refreshed' by Gus @ Pacific back in the '90s.

  10. #30
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,874
    I just love the MFI on these cars. As has been stated they have to be well set up. Once they are, they are bulletproof. Great fun to drive. I am fortunate to have one of the best at setting these up nearby, Ed Mayo.

    First a stock '69 E 2.0
    ...and a not so stock 3.2ss in a '72 T tub.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    65 356SC Dolphin Gray
    66 912 Green
    69 911E Tangerine
    72 911T GP White
    72 911T Aubergine
    72 911T Lilac
    72 911S Black (voodoo)
    86 911 GP White Targa (now sons)
    90 964C4 Black Targa
    94 964C2 Black Coupe
    08 GT3 Speed Yellow

Similar Threads

  1. Poll: Who Has a Kardex for Their Car?
    By LongRanger in forum General Info
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 05:32 PM
  2. Member age poll
    By kenikh in forum General Info
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 10:46 AM
  3. POLL/CENSUS: What's Your Lid? . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-01-2013, 03:28 PM
  4. Poll on '67S ????
    By 69Sman in forum General Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 12:23 PM
  5. Speed TV poll.. Get out the vote
    By super9064 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.