Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 67S Engine Rebuild

  1. #1

    67S Engine Rebuild

    I've started to strip a 67S engine I obtained from LA a couple of months ago. After removing the pistons they measure 90mm instead of 80mm ish? It’s also been fitted with “Arias” pistons which look very new.

    My question is:

    Can a 2.0 engine be fitted with such a large piston when still incorporating the same stroke (66)? Would the heads have been modified? The valves seem correct @ 38/42 for an early S engine

    Puzzled???

    Garry

  2. #2
    Garry; Sounds like you have yourself a short stroke 2,5L as 66x90=2506 built on your 901/02. This should be a very sweet running engine. Are the tops of the piston crowns chamfered around the outside circumference or are the combustion chambers chamfered around their lower circumference? Those would be the two approaches to using the big p&c with early heads.
    Early 911S Registry
    Looking for engine 960 168
    Looking for gear box 103 165

  3. #3
    I would check on the cylinder head dates. Someone might have substituted later heads versus modifying the original 2.0 heads to work with the 90 mm cylinders.
    - Neil
    '67 911S (Ol' Ivory)
    '82 Hewlett Packard 34C
    Early 911S Registry # 512

  4. #4
    Thanks guys, I've only taken off one bank of pistons so far but checking the rod P/N (which I can't find anywhere) I think "whoever" may have changed the stoke after all. The engine was left outside for a number of years without plugs so the cylinders are looking a little sorry for themselfs.

    Head manfacture dates seem spot on

    By the way this engines going in my 67S RHD I'm restoring.

    Even more puzzled

    Pictures attached:

    Thanks

    Garry
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  5. #5
    Why not just measure the stroke, then you'll know. Rods don't have part numbers, only casting numbers, but I'll agree, they do appear to have the beam shape of a 2.4/2.7 rod.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  6. #6
    Ed is right, those are 2,4 rods. Somebody probably put a 2,4 crank in there. Looks like somebody flycut the devil out of those original heads. See the casting number in an oval? Those are SWB heads for sure. Now look at the thickness of the ring between the combustion chamber and the head stud hole, and compare it to my uncut 1966 head. You can see what happened.

    So congratulations you have a 90 x 90 x 70.4 * 3.1416 /4 * 6 /1000 = 2519cc motor!
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  7. #7
    Measured the rods today and they size as 2.0/2.2 therefore 2.5 total me thinks?

    The pistons look really sexy, so if I can get new rings from Arias I'm on a winner Still bet it's not that easy....

    Big end reads -0.25 so the cranks had a shave also.

    Thanks

    Garry
    Attached Images Attached Images     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-02-2005, 03:13 PM
  2. engine rebuild
    By diescher in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 06:18 PM
  3. Engine Rebuild
    By johntyboy in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-23-2005, 01:06 AM
  4. Engine Rebuild
    By johntyboy in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 01:26 PM
  5. my engine rebuild
    By 68'911 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-05-2004, 10:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.