Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Venolia Piston Feedback

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381

    Venolia Piston Feedback

    Has anyone used Venolia pistons during a rebuild? I'm looking for feedback on the use of these pistons.
    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    The problem with Venolia's (and a few others) Porsche pistons is their design. JE's, CP's, Omega's can be set up with less piston-to-cylinder wall clearance so they run quieter and last longer.

    JMHO, but I would leave the Venolia's to the domestic applications.
    Steve Weiner
    Rennsport Systems
    Portland Oregon
    503.244.0990
    E-mail: porsche@rennsportsystems.com
    http://www.rennsportsystems.com

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    Thanks for the responses. I wouldn't be buying off the shelf pistons. Venolia is telling me to send them my original pistons and they will duplicate them exactly. I have heard of excessive piston slap when using JE, Venolia, CP, etc. And you say the answer to that is to decrease the piston to cylinder wall clearance? At the price Venolia is quoting (and JE too) I just thought it was worth looking into...

  4. #4
    I have a set of Venolia pistons in a Supercharged Lancia 037 engine. It is a 2.1 litre Water Injected Group B engine producing around 310 BHP.

    The pistons are not too bad but have picked up slightly on the skirts and do seem a bit heavy.

    We are going to replace them this time around with some lighter cross braced slipper pistons to try to reduce piston weight.

    I think the choice of piston, its design and selection of material really depends on the application.

    Most aftermarket pistons now seem to be made in 2618-T16 which is a material originally designated RR 58. This is a very high strength alloy and has very good high temperature performance but it expands quite signficantly and needs more cold clearance than a typical Mahle piston.

    Most Mahle production pistons are made from higher Silicon Alloys such as 4032-T6. Higher Silicon Alloys also tend to have better ring groove life as they are harder and more wear resistant.

    If I were building a road engine with Cast Iron or Biral Cylinders I would favour a 4032-T6 piston as this could run with much lower cold clearance than a 2618-T16 part which is, I believe, wher the reputation for piston slap has come from.

    I would be a bit less concerned with a Nikasil cylinder but again for road use I think 4032-T6 is the optimum choice.

    If I were building a high end race motor - particuarly a Turbo or a Supercharged engine then I would chose 2618-T16 and have the ring groove are wear coated.

    If you precisely copy an ealry 2.0 or 2.4 Mahle piston made froma high-ish Silicon Alloy in 2618 and run it in a Biral cylinder you could have some problems and it may well pick up.

    I would ask what the material is and how much clearance they are allowing.

    We have 3.0 SC pistons made in 4032-T6 with a 10.5:1 compression ratio and have had great results.


Similar Threads

  1. Looking for Feedback on 1989 911 C4
    By markusc in forum Other Porsche Passions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 05:17 AM
  2. Want some feedback on Gullwing Motorcars Inc.
    By c2convert in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 12:04 PM
  3. Feedback on Japanese starter ?
    By RS-GT in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-23-2009, 12:08 PM
  4. No undercoating ? I need feedback...
    By RS-GT in forum General Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 05:26 AM
  5. RS lightweight conversion feedback
    By markg in forum General Info
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-19-2008, 02:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.