Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Titanium Rod Bolts

  1. #1

    Titanium Rod Bolts

    I am interested in learning about Porsche's use of titanium con-rod bolts in the early 911engines, up to 1973.

    1) Which engines utilise these bolts?

    2) Are they 'single use' like the standard bolts, or can they be reused?

    3) What sizes were available (and what are the applicable part numbers)?

    4) Are they still available?

    5) Are they considered reliable?

    Any and all information appreciated, TIA.

    Duncan
    Duncan Miller
    1969 911 S

  2. #2
    Duncan,

    I would find it surprising that Porsche used a Titanium Bolt for a connecting rod particularly pre 1973 as this was very early in the development life of Alpha-Beta Titanium alloys.

    A typical Ti bolt material of the period would have been made from 6Al4V which would have had a maximum tensile strength of about 160 000psi but very poor notch sensitivity.

    Modern high performance steel fasteners are readily available at 220 000psi and advanced materials can be as strong as 300 000psi.

    ARP claim that their 6Al4V fasteners are rated for 180 000 psi but this would mean that the material would have to prestrained prior to heat treatment and I believe their ductility would be very poor.

    There are much better Ti alloys to use for 180 000psi fasteners but again they will all have limited notch sensitivity and relatively poor ductility due to the manufacturing techniques needed to obtain this level of strength.

    The old Porsche 'use once' fasteners were simply not strong enough to give enough preload needed to avoid fatigue failure without permanently deforming hence the instruction to replace them once used.

    Modern steel ARP fasteners should be reusable even at the low end of their spec which is the ARP2000 material.

    If you tried to use a lower strength Ti alloy (160 000 psi) fastener in this manner you would find that the yield strain and the fracture strain would be too close together to be reliable and that some bolts would fail during tightening as they would have very little remaining work hardening capacity.

    When you add to this the ability of Ti to gall I think it is a most unsuitable con rod bolt material.
    Last edited by chris_seven; 02-23-2011 at 05:43 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,235
    I think I have some Ti rod bolts do not know what year. Also did 906 Ti rods use steel bolts, or Ti bolts?
    Mike

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sonoma, CA
    Posts
    376
    That begets an interesting question. A reliable source told me that Most of the Factory 906's used Pauter TI rods after Porsche observed their superiority in Vasek Polak engines. This left the Porsche TI rods only for customer engines........

    So which 906 rods used which bolts?

    johnt

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,242
    Are the bolts themselves titanium, or are they just special bolts for titanium rods.
    At one time I had some, and traded them for other parts more useful to me.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  6. #6
    Even at 180 000psi the strength of the fastener would only be the same as a cap screw in terms of preload capacity. - about 4000kg per bolt I would guess.

    An ARP 2000 would be closer to 5000kg per bolt.

    Its elastic deformation would be about double that of a steel fastener and it would have to be nitrided or treated in some other way to stop it from sticking to the rod.

    Mike- if you have Ti rod bolts can you determine how they were treated to stop galling. It may be worth a quick check with a magnet.

  7. #7
    The 917 engine (912) used Titanium case through-bolts, If I remember Fere correctly. Thinner diameter, too, because of the spherical washers. The power take off to the clutch was also Titanium on the later models.

    I believe the Can-Am cars used Titanium uprights, so does that mean the center-lock hub was Titanium as well? They were using it for springs and other pieces.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  8. #8
    Mezger indicates the use of Ti rods and Ti rod bolts in the 917 in his paper to the IME in 1972. With respect to coating..... "Porsche uses a surface treatment called
    'Tiduran' to improve the sliding characteristics. Tiduran means a normally two-hours treatment in a cyanogen bath at 800°C"

  9. #9
    Tiduran - Titanium Nitride about 0.002" deep - classic for anti-galling. Probably would now be carried out with a plasma technique to replace the Cyanide Bath.

  10. #10
    I have a setof Ti rod bolts sitting in a box on the roof of our engine room.

    They will never see use as their history is unknown...

    However, it's interesting to note that they came along with a pile of parts from a privateer long-stroke ST motor.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Titanium Connecting Rod Set (6)
    By CaryPhotography in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-10-2014, 08:18 AM
  2. WTB: Titanium bolts
    By mike curnow in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2013, 10:24 AM
  3. titanium 906 rod set on Ebay
    By earlyaircooled in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-23-2012, 10:54 PM
  4. Wtb titanium con rods
    By RealRS#406 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-06-2009, 05:17 PM
  5. NOS Carrera 6 titanium rods
    By kenikh in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-21-2009, 04:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.