Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 906 cams Q - compatibility with 2.0s 67/68 carbs.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member #1525 gilbert911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    359

    906 cams Q - compatibility with 2.0s 67/68 carbs.

    factory 906 cams in - factory 2.0s cams out.
    Will it work retaining std 2.0s heads, P&B's?, rods?
    Can the cams work in the std spray bar towers?

    Thanks for all advise

  2. #2
    I've not done it, but I don't see why the spray bar won't work. What you will need to check however is the piston valve clearance and the diameter of the valve compared to the valve pocket. I'd suggest doing a trial assembly with clay checking of the valve piston interface.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  3. #3
    Senior Member BURN-BROS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Camarillo, Ca.
    Posts
    153
    Hi Gilbert,

    The heads would need to be ported to effectively use those cams.

    With ARP rod bolts you could use the stock rods provided you keep the rpms under 7800 rpm. They can see 8200 rpms, but I would be concerned about failure at that point.

    If it is a centerlube set of cams then you will need to plug the nose of the cam to prevent pressure loss.

    Spray bar cam towers are recommended and centerlube/spraybar would be ideal.

    The stock pistons will not work and the compression is quite low for such a big cam. A set of 69S pistons may give you the clearance but clearance would definitely be checked with clay. 906 pistons may very well be required.

    The carburetors are too small, but can be made to work ok with larger venturies.


    A better cam for what you have would be a Mod S with mild portwork. The Mod S can make 40 more HP @ 4500 rpm than 906 cams, which really do not start working untll 5000-5500 rpm.
    Aaron Burnham
    Burnham Performance
    1071 Avenida Acaso ste D.
    Camarillo, Ca. 93012
    805-240-6931

    _________________________

  4. #4
    Member #1525 gilbert911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    359
    Aaron, Ed
    Thanks for taking the time to reply - appreciated.
    My question was what would happen if I swapped out the cams. My GOAL is actually to try and get some 46IDA's on tall manifolds to work on a 2.0s 67/68 engine.
    I figured I would need the 906 cam to cope. But the knock on changes seem significant.
    So my goal - what would be the implications of running the 46's on an otherwise stock 2.0s engine?

    Thank-you

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,694
    I think that they would be overkill - in addition 906/911R tall manifolds have 38mm lower ID to match the inlet ports on those engines so wouldn't work with a stock 2.0S engine.

    I have been speaking with Mark Allen @ Vintage Excellence about the repro tall manifolds that he has advertised on this board but they are some way from 'production' & SG Racing in Belgium (who had been offering similar manifolds for a few years) seem to have disappeared (certainly their website is now inaccessible).
    Andy

    Early 911S Reg #753
    R Gruppe #105

Similar Threads

  1. Did very early '67S come with "E" type cams and IDE carbs?
    By LeftFootBraker in forum General Info
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-29-2014, 03:05 PM
  2. H1 / H4 compatibility
    By 50/50 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2008, 09:12 AM
  3. Oil cooler compatibility
    By Zithlord in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-18-2008, 08:44 AM
  4. Bosch CDI unit part no's and compatibility
    By fourteenten in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 02:00 PM
  5. Freshly rebuilt street/track 3.0 with carbs and cams
    By RSwannabe in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 08:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.