I was just looking at that, wondering what year it really is, guessing 69 with some other motor, but not caring enough to look the posted vin up myself:-)
11870146 VIN says 1968, but has no marker lights peculiar to 1968. Looks to be a LWB, strange for a '68
2.2 engine would not be original, and looks like 16" rims are much newer.
Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers
dave..not ALL 1968's came here with side markers. 1967 door handles. 1969 speaker grill, quarters& fenders look to LWB. So, if the VIN says 1968 we've seen these adaptations be4. I've seen worst.
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
Curt Autenrieth
S Registry # 152
Porsches:
1.6L 2.7L
1.8L 3.0L
2.0L 3.2L
2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
3.8L
'68 T, ROW car, no '68 T for USA, so no side marker is correct.
+1 CorrectOriginally Posted by res0ca5d
Yes, I see something wrong... the car is ugly, rusty, and they want wayyyyy too much $$ for it.
just my .02
Thank you, E, for my morning laugh...
So, this is two cars pieced together?
Peter Kane
'72 911S Targa
Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
Common..you guys are getting slow it seems at least Peter caught on there's got to be at least to cars DNA here...,battery boxes,LWB fenders this is at
least a 69 chassis parading with '68 numbers my question is this "dealer really that oblivious? Bert
Yup, I saw the battery box and said: huh? Then I went looking at the rear adjuster covers, and that screamed LWB. The paint badge and compliance badge below it say 68 or 69. The guages are 69 up. The mag tranny case says 69 up. My guess is 1969, but depends if it is stitched or just renumbered.
Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote