Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Poll on '67S ????

  1. #1

    Poll on '67S ????

    Darn, what happened to the POLL on the 67S? It was JUST getting interesting....
    Bahia Red '72 911S
    Meerblau PTS 2019 Speedster
    GP Silver, 2018 GT2RS WP....the BEAST
    Daytona Gray 2021 RS6 Avant....BEAST #2...Best daily EVER

    ES #333

    GONE...MANY, many great ones....

  2. #2
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,464

    Lightbulb

    Stacy and all...

    The soft delete lets you read my explanation........

    Sorry Allen, I feel unfair unless endorsed by the poster/owner

    If it's about a car out there on the net it will probably be fair game, if it's started here by someone who owns it and wants to sell it... it seems fair that THAT person should start or endorse any poll on the price of the car...........
    Last edited by Chuck Miller; 10-12-2011 at 12:24 PM.
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Miller View Post
    Stacy and all...

    The soft delete lets you read my explanation........

    Sorry Tom, I feel unfair unless endorsed by the poster/owner

    If it's about a car out there on the net it will probably be fair game, if it's started here by someone who owns it and wants to sell it... it seems fair that THAT person should start or endorse any poll on the price of the car...........
    Hi Chuck,

    Should I post the Poll on this "General" forum? See the following:
    "Hi Dr 911E, thanks Allen, and why not, it would be very interesting to see what the thought around this issue is...earlier this year a couple of early examples sold at auction for more than estimate with a '64 going for $225,000, a red '67 soft targa going for $165,000, making this car a "good" buy at anything less than $100,000. It would not take $65K to put it in condition to be auctioned at this level, but really that would be a shame, maybe someone can understand this? I appreciate you continuing to follow the thread and your advice, I say yes, please put the poll back up, thank you. Charles "

    Thanks.

    -Allen-
    Last edited by Allen Henderson; 10-12-2011 at 12:07 PM.

  4. #4
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,464
    Allen,

    Your original poll is back up and in the General Forum.............

    Chuck
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

Similar Threads

  1. Poll: Who Has a Kardex for Their Car?
    By LongRanger in forum General Info
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 05:32 PM
  2. POLL: Carbs or MFI?
    By LongRanger in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 112
    Last Post: 12-27-2013, 09:29 AM
  3. Member age poll
    By kenikh in forum General Info
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 10:46 AM
  4. POLL/CENSUS: What's Your Lid? . . .
    By LongRanger in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-01-2013, 03:28 PM
  5. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-13-2004, 06:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.