Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Here we go again...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Bill Simmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Virginia's Blue Ridge
    Posts
    1,679

    Here we go again. Another Early 65...

    Looks like another 65 listed as a 66.
    Last edited by Bill Simmeth; 03-18-2012 at 08:48 AM.

  2. #2
    I think it's a 66 looking at the engine. Not because it has Weber carburetors.

    It's missing this: http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...l=1#post452673


    Quote of the day: "I think the original issue was a bent valve. It ran but ran rough after my wife miss shifted."
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  3. #3
    Senior Member Bill Simmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Virginia's Blue Ridge
    Posts
    1,679
    Look at the dash.

  4. #4
    It's a later model MFI engine that's been carbed (how unusual!)
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #5
    Looks like a money pit from here.

    Ask me a Corvette question next time.
    Last edited by sithot; 03-17-2012 at 04:06 AM.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  6. #6
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    I have the same hood support setups as this car... but mine is a 67....

  7. #7
    Senior Member Bill Simmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Virginia's Blue Ridge
    Posts
    1,679
    Seller replied vin nbr = 300430. Picture of VIN tag added.

    And 6405 - Champagne Yellow - like the other one up for sale.
    Last edited by Bill Simmeth; 03-17-2012 at 04:35 AM.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Simmeth View Post
    Seller replied vin nbr = 300430. Picture of VIN tag added.
    A few years ago that car was discussed here. There should be an old thread unless it was pulled.

    Richard

  9. #9
    Senior Member Bill Simmeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Virginia's Blue Ridge
    Posts
    1,679
    Quote Originally Posted by 304678 View Post
    A few years ago that car was discussed here.
    Yes Richard you are correct, interesting discussion.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    548
    The car has the six pleat seats if I'm correct. Nice find if you have a 1964 car but not the correct seats. The fact that the VIN is not on the correct place is bad news though.

    Erik

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.