Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: 1972 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6

    1972 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7

    Hi,

    I found this Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7 while doing an internet search:

    http://www.finecars.cc/en/detail/car...Browcount%5D=6

    Any thoughts? It looks great but seller has little or no history.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    Hi,

    Certainly a desirable Carrera based it's early production date (ie, a homologation model). BUT, looking at the photos the restoration is nothing special. There should be no undercoating in the engine bay or on the trunk floor or on the underside of the car. Also the aluminum VIN tag is not original. Next I would want to see a clear photo of the trunk stamped VIN. The photo of of the engine serial number is not vey clear but looks to be restamped based on the incorrect font of the numbers.

    Oh also the original color was Signal Yellow. Why would you do a restoration and not paint it the correct color. Signal Yellow is a fantastic color. The seats are incorrectly recovered also, they should have perlon cord inserts. I could on and on unfortunately.
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by fryardds View Post
    There should be no undercoating in the engine bay or on the trunk floor or on the underside of the car.
    I thought that was on lightweights only?
    cheers, Mike
    Member#1664
    1972 911 S/RSR to Martini Prototype specification
    http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15294

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    Here is what I mean about the incorrect font. I enlarged the photo and you can clearly see the '3' is incorrect. The others are suspect also (especially the '6') but the '3' is the give away of a restamped, non-original case.



    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike_Moore View Post
    I thought that was on lightweights only?
    Hi Mike,

    Yeah, that where there is a bit of confusion. Roughly the first 1000 Carreras were all 'lightweights' when they were first built, because these cars were all built to be a homologation model which was even more extreme than the so-called 'Lightweight' M471 conversion. So Porsche produced all these 1000 cars in the RSH (homologation) form, had them certified, then converted the majority to either M472 or M471 models. So they all had thin metal and minimal undercoating even though they were sold as a Touring or Sport model.
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,532
    Here is link to a first series Touring model at Maxted-Page that shows the correct VIN stamping in the tunk and on the aluminum tag as well as the engine and transmission serial number. Good reference for you to use when studying these cars. Also look at the smooth paint on the lateral chassis supports in the engine bay, which is correct for a homologated Carrera.

    http://www.maxted-page.com/cars/car-details.aspx?id=201
    Brian

    '71T
    R Gruppe #299

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6
    Thank you for this valuable information. The fact that the seller has not provided any history has also raised red flags.

  8. #8
    thanks for explaining that Brian, very helpful!
    cheers, Mike
    Member#1664
    1972 911 S/RSR to Martini Prototype specification
    http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15294

  9. #9
    The boss where the engine number is stamped looks to be machined down and then new number re-stamped with incorrect fonts......?

  10. #10
    Is it correct that the sets only had cord inserts?
    John

    Early 911 S Registry member 473
    RGruppe member 445

Similar Threads

  1. FS: 4 original riveted alloy rims wheels for Porsche 904 Gts Carrera , 356 Carrera 2
    By 911 SWTARGA in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2020, 05:05 PM
  2. WTT: 2003 Carrera 4S for 1967-1972 911
    By PeterM1965 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-2011, 06:53 AM
  3. 1986 911 Carrera/Euro 74 Porsche Carrera RS (clone) on the Bird
    By byron in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 10:25 AM
  4. 1972 911T with 3.2 Carrera, alloy 915
    By toomany911's in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-11-2008, 12:11 PM
  5. Tool kit Porsche 911 Carrera RS 1972/73
    By 72targa in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2005, 05:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.