Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Different Rear Swing Arms - which is correct for a '69 car

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 06-26-2012, 03:12 AM #1
    Andy B
    Andy B is offline
    Senior Member Andy B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Near Bondi Beach, Sydney Australia
    Posts
    437

    Different Rear Swing Arms - which is correct for a '69 car

    OK, today I was with my mechanic and he's found I have two different rear swing arms (trailing arms) on my '69 911E race car.

    Looking at the photos, the difference is in the last end part of the leg, the conical shaped bit that attaches to the shock.

    I suspect one is original and one is not. Question is which is which ??

    Second question , who's got one ??

    Thanks for any help.

    First photo is LHSIMG_0395.jpgIMG_0396.jpg and second is RHS.
    Last edited by Andy B; 06-26-2012 at 03:15 AM.
    Andrew B (Tiger)
    911 69E Historic Production Race Car
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Rear Banana Arms SWB
    By 68911+1 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-26-2013, 05:12 PM
  2. FS 930 rear arms
    By OliveR in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-11-2012, 01:01 AM
  3. '69 Trailing/Swing/Banana Arms - which is correct ??
    By Andy B in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-01-2012, 07:22 PM
  4. FS: Aluminum swing arm set upgrade for '70-'73
    By budge96 in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 07:05 PM
  5. New bushing necesary on my swing arms?
    By Zithlord in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 05:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.