Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Plug Gap - Best Guess

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    446

    Plug Gap - Best Guess

    I am replacing the plugs on 301596 - I'm new to the car so don't have much to go on. Records from the car indicate it had a "2.2S" kit installed at the last engine rebuild. Car is running webers (I'm rebuilding those right now too), not the Solex's if that matters.

    The plugs that came out of the car were Bosche W7DCO. Typical gap of the old plugs was +-.035". The plugs were quite sooty. The new plugs comes pre gapped to .032". Factory owners manual suggests Bosche W 250 P 21 with a .014" gap. How far apart in heat range are these 2 plugs? At this point I am just replacing the existing plugs in kind until I can get some experience and then tweak from there.

    Any suggestions where I should set the gap to start with on the new (W7DCO) plugs? Thanks in advance,

    Last edited by luke-44; 06-30-2012 at 10:35 AM.

  2. #2
    What ignition system are you running? Stock or C.D. (as would have been on a 2.2S) If stock then follow the specs you have, if C.D. they called for .024" A 250-p21 is colder than a W7 series. In NEW Bosch system lower number equals colder, just opposite of their old system, I think the change occurred sometime back in the eighties. Just for reference back in the day, a 265-p21 was for an S, and the 250-p21 was for the E. Just to further muddy the waters do NOT use the new style platinum with the center electrode imbedded in the porcelain, they seem to work best with newer lean burn engines. I prefer the NGK BP7ES for early type engines. That is what i run in my early S's.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    446
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    What ignition system are you running? ..If stock then follow the specs you have, ...
    Stock ignition. So to clarify, are you saying gap them to .014"? Seems so small.

  4. #4
    I agree it was certainly smaller than we are used to seeing. I can't honestly say what gaps we were using back in the sixties and seventies when these cars were most current, but I do know that nowadays I set the gaps to .024" I'm sure the engineers were trying to insure there would always be enough voltage from the coil to jump the gap. Of course the biggest change since then is unleaded gas, less deposits build up. Use the .024"
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    446
    Thanks Ed. .024" it is.

Similar Threads

  1. OK, Guess what year car this is regarding ;-)....
    By fastrnu in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-23-2012, 06:04 PM
  2. You'll never guess...yet ANOTHER '65 on ebay!
    By 911E4ME in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-19-2012, 04:24 PM
  3. Guess where this picture was taken......
    By robsled in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-28-2012, 11:13 AM
  4. Wow I guess the economy is getting better
    By boxster03 in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-26-2011, 04:51 PM
  5. I guess I'm confused...
    By Homemade 911 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-20-2007, 07:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.