Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Merger of ALMS and Grand Am

  1. #1
    Senior Member boba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    1,874

    Merger of ALMS and Grand Am

    Breaking News - ALMS and Grand Am to merge.

    Grand Am will be the sanctioning body, more to be announced next Wed.

    It is about time, there was not a big enough market to support two series.
    65 356SC Dolphin Gray
    66 912 Green
    69 911E Tangerine
    72 911T GP White
    72 911T Aubergine
    72 911T Lilac
    72 911S Black (voodoo)
    86 911 GP White Targa (now sons)
    90 964C4 Black Targa
    94 964C2 Black Coupe
    08 GT3 Speed Yellow

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    2,564
    Wow! The ALMS tv coverage sucked anyway.
    72S, 72T now ST

  3. #3
    I hope they keep the car classes of ALMS. I like the officiating of Grand-Am better (allow more bumping) but the ALMS cars are the best.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  4. #4
    Member #1722 Nine17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    877
    Car classes at Le Mans? The France's have already been to France...
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    Are you saying there is a France driving that dodge? It doesn't really have anything to do with my post. I just don't want the almost spec racing of DP cars.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  6. #6
    Member #1722 Nine17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    877
    That's Herschel McGriff, not a France. But he's in France. In a France spec class car accepted by the ACO. In France.

    The ALMS is definitely not spec racing. Like Daytona Prototypes. Or LMPC or GTC class cars...

    Oh, never mind...

  7. #7
    Well those are field-fillers but ok you are right. Before the recession it was not spec. I think they could just have a whole race dedicated to the GT2 cars by themselves. That is where all the action is at (although Road America was great to watch Lucas Luhr).
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  8. #8
    Member #1722 Nine17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Flieger View Post
    Well those are field-fillers but ok you are right.
    At Laguna this past may, there were two P1 cars, five P2 cars, and nine Prototype Challenge cars. Kind of makes you wonder who is filling the field for whom?

    It's always great to watch Lucas Luhr. Dr. Ullrich of Audi Sport doesn't seem to care for old-school Bad Boys from the Porsche Junior Team like Lucas -- but that was Greg Pickett's good luck!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Orbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Jupiter , Florida
    Posts
    293
    The rumor had been around for years now and it finally looks like we will have one professional sports car series. The writing was on the wall since Panoz had sold Mosport and the front office of the ALMS has always been a revolving door. ALMS could never attract a title sponsor to give them a financial buffer that would allow them to grow - Grand Am does not have a title sponsor either. Some of the biggest questions also relate to the many support series: the very popular IMSA GT3 Cup, World Challenge, IMSA Lites, Continental Series, and many others. What do they do with half of the weekends available now to run as a support series? The very best of situations for the "new" series would be to have two marquis races per weekend - Prototypes and GT. Within each race you could have 3 different "classes" to accomodate different budgets - IF both races had the same TV coverage then the GT guys could finally get the TV exposure they deserve. Prototypes are sexy and they attract the most attention but very rarely do you see a large group of prototypes fighting at the end of a race ( Grand AM DP's do the best job at providing some suspense) - budgets are the reason. GT cars are different, good rules that say the cars have to be 2300 pounds with 500 HP can really make for some fierce racing - even when the small teams are mixing it up with the quasi-factory supported cars. I want to leave you with one more thought - DTM. Do you remember that amazing series in Germany? I didn't understand it when I heard it being spoke about by high level Grand Am officials but it makes much more sense now - my best guess is that somebody high up in the Grand Am saw some really good DTM racing and said - "we need that in the USA". I can only hope that our best days for sportscar racing are just in front of us.

    Rodger Hawley

    Orbitracing.com

    GT Winner 24 Hours of Daytona 2004

    Porsche - of course!
    Last edited by Orbit; 09-02-2012 at 08:31 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,580
    I would not be at all surprised to see something like DTM in a few years.

    Richard Newton

Similar Threads

  1. Merger of ALMS and Grand Am
    By boba in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2012, 03:17 PM
  2. ALMS in Salt Lake
    By jetdriver21 in forum Drives, Tours, Gatherings, Racing and Adventures
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 12:35 PM
  3. Audi pulls out of the ALMS
    By Chuck Miller in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 04:47 AM
  4. RS Spyders 1st 2nd 3rd at LB ALMS
    By Jim Garfield in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-24-2007, 12:01 PM
  5. Lime Rock ALMS Anyone?
    By Jol Dantzig in forum General Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-30-2004, 04:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.