Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Valuation opinion: effect of performance mods on collectibility

  1. #1
    aka techweenie Eminence Gris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West Los Angeles
    Posts
    3,099

    Valuation opinion: effect of performance mods on collectibility

    An acquaintance wants a vintage 911 or two as investments. One car he's contemplating was originally a 2.4 E, but the original engine was given a full upgrade to RS spec: displacement, cams and MFI pump cam. So it's essentially an "invisible" upgrade of 40+ HP.

    My personal opinion is that this is a good thing (or at least not a detriment) for a car to be driven and not just displayed.

    What say you?
    techweenie.com

    My parts fetcher: 2016 Tesla S | Currently building: 73 RSR tribute and 69 RS tribute

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminence Gris View Post
    My personal opinion is that this is a good thing (or at least not a detriment) for a car to be driven and not just displayed.
    He either wants to drive it or not. Life is short and often unpredictable. Go for it while you still can. These cars are wasted in collections.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    I really don't think upgrades to a matching numbers engine will hurt the value much. We like to drive them, so certainly enhancing the driving experience can't hurt...

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,580
    You can do it if nothing show externally. Once things start to look different the value goes down. Original always brings the best money. Think about this. Do you own the car or are you the custodian of the car.

    Richard Newton
    Facebook

  5. #5
    Senior Member NorthernThrux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,258
    Yep, it's (one reason) why the upgraded tensioners with the collars are preferred over the oil fed ones by the purist restorers. No external clues to modification. All boils down to, as Richard said, whether you feel you own the car or are the custodian.

    If you own the car, do what you (he) want. It's yours and the imprint you leave on it will become part of its heritage. Just don't expect that to yield the highest return on investment. It may yield the highest smiles per investment for you. If however, you are the caretaker, then there is an expectation that you will keep/restore the unadulterated original experience. These are the cars that will become rarer and rarer and will be the ones to hold/increase their value the most. Doesn't mean the car can't be driven, but mile for mile, smile for smile, the original car will always fetch more, no matter how many additional cc are under the hood or how many cibie lights are on the bonnet or what kind of radio was added in the dash.

    Most importantly...keep driving them.
    Early 911S Registry # 2395
    1973 Porsche 911S in ivory white 5sp MT
    2015 Porsche Macan S in agate grey 7sp PDK

  6. #6
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184
    I think it's fine, it it looks the same.

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741

  7. #7
    I can't imagine complaining about more power...
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  8. #8
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Eminence Gris View Post
    An acquaintance wants a vintage 911 or two as investments. One car he's contemplating was originally a 2.4 E, but the original engine was given a full upgrade to RS spec: displacement, cams and MFI pump cam. So it's essentially an "invisible" upgrade of 40+ HP.

    My personal opinion is that this is a good thing (or at least not a detriment) for a car to be driven and not just displayed.

    What say you?
    Modified Porsches are NOT "investment" grade cars. My experience , ownership, and driving experience is that T is a T, E is a E, and a S is a S and should ( for investment) be left in it's original configuration.......that being said, and NOT being an investor...... torque rules !!!
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  9. #9
    Lighting Specialist jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    4,270
    I'm not that knowledgeable about tangibles as investments. But I watch "Antiques Roadshow" once and a while and I have a glancing familiarity with the value of Morgan silver dollars as my father gave me a bunch of uncirculated ones. My perception is that once an item moves to collectible investment grade the valuation standard changes dramatically - it's all about originality and condition. The slightest change and the slightest variation in condition have massive impact on value.

    Those of us who have hot-rodded early 911's that are now being sought out as investment grade collectibles, such as S's, have had a lot of fun, and we've added a lot of value - to the untouched original cars.

    On the one hand I lament that our cars are becoming investible assets. On the other hand, it works out because I happen to have a lot of vintage parts for investment grade cars and I can generate a bit of cash flow with those in order to pay for my lowly non-investment grade cars, such as my '91 C2 and 73.5 T Targa. The 964 is bone stock right now, but I'm dying to hot rod one.

    Cheers,
    JohnA
    Lighting Resources for Hardcore Air-Cooled Porsche Enthusiasts”
    ——-
    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    AC Shop: BEST-IN-CLASS Air Cooled 911 Lighting Parts => 911BestInClass.com
    AC Site: The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com
    Instagram: Please Follow => AC Shop Instagram

  10. #10
    old softie67S
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Sanibel Fl
    Posts
    457

    I think it hurts the value in the long run

    I might be in the minority, but I think as great a driving machine an early car is with 2.7 rs engine is, modifying the original engine is a mistake and I wouldn't be inclined to buy it. Having the original engine pickled and on a shelf with a hot rod replacement motor is the engine compartment would be worth a premium to me. A modified original case would be a deduction.

    tom
    Tom

    67S soft rear window
    60 356 Cab
    70 914-6 3.2 short stroke twin plug
    05 Audi S4 Cabrio (commuter)
    05 Audi Alroad (family driver)
    Aprilia SR 50R (Sanibel scoot)

Similar Threads

  1. The effect of 911E cams in a 2.4 911S engine?
    By M491 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-31-2015, 03:32 AM
  2. RS Flares effect on value on a 72 S Targa
    By pu911rsr in forum General Info
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-20-2014, 09:35 AM
  3. 912 mods for a hot rod
    By ckissick in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-26-2012, 04:50 AM
  4. What is the effect when dwell angle is too large?
    By caproader in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-03-2011, 12:25 PM
  5. 2.2 E mods
    By 0687 in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 12:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.