Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: FS: @eBay - 1969 911S Soft Window Targa

  1. #1

    FS: @eBay - 1969 911S Soft Window Targa

    Not mine...

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...-/321084091768

    Zero feedback seller. Tiny photos. Lists the engine as a 2.7. Real deal? Scam?

  2. #2
    ask for VIN-/Engin-Number and title and we will see

    Greets René

  3. #3
    Senior Member NorthernThrux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,258
    Says 2.7L in the Ad....
    Early 911S Registry # 2395
    1973 Porsche 911S in ivory white 5sp MT
    2015 Porsche Macan S in agate grey 7sp PDK

  4. #4
    I saw this ad yesterday. Can anyone verify if the car was ever offered to the public with the advertised soft rear window and the 2.7L engine. I've never seen or heard of these options offered in a 1969S model. I thought the Targa soft window was ended, by Porsche, in 1968 and the largest displacement offered in 1969 was the 2.0 911S motor?

  5. #5
    There were a very few 911S soft window targas sold in 2009. It's a bit of a mystery how few. Perhaps as few as six.

    '69 cars had the 2.0 engines.

  6. #6
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574
    One thing for sure about the validity of the Ebay ad is that there were NOT "92" 1969 911S SWT's made by the factory that year. As a factual reference, the Porsche factory did NOT delineate plastic window Targas' VS glass window Targas'.
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  7. #7
    Senior Member VintageExcellen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,945
    no records were kept by the factory on soft window production unfortunatly, they did not have a option code or official offering for the plastic window but if you asked for it then you could get it on a long wheel base car for 69. Almost no one wanted the plastic window and a couple of the 69 SWT cars were actually mistakes. It is possible to fake one but the guys in the know can spot factory installed soft window mounts/traits, etc. I have a 69S SWT for sale this summer that would blow this car away. My guess on production numbers of these cars is in the 10-20 range based on what I have seen in the world, but who knows. I have said in the past:

    "The novelty of the plastic rear window was a nuisance when they were new since owners relied on these cars for year round daily driving, however, this nuisance of the past is now the delight of today as these cars are only seldom driven and highly collectible."

  8. #8
    Senior Member curtisaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by VintageExcellen View Post
    no records were kept by the factory on soft window production unfortunatly, they did not have a option code or official offering for the plastic window but if you asked for it then you could get it on a long wheel base car for 69. Almost no one wanted the plastic window and a couple of the 69 SWT cars were actually mistakes. It is possible to fake one but the guys in the know can spot factory installed soft window mounts/traits, etc. I have a 69S SWT for sale this summer that would blow this car away. My guess on production numbers of these cars is in the 10-20 range based on what I have seen in the world, but who knows. I have said in the past:

    "The novelty of the plastic rear window was a nuisance when they were new since owners relied on these cars for year round daily driving, however, this nuisance of the past is now the delight of today as these cars are only seldom driven and highly collectible."
    Interesting hyperbole. The fact of the matter of plastic windows is that all convertables, domestic and foreign, in 1969, were plastic and vinyl. All the MG, Triumph, MB, Jaguar, Corvettes, et;al were made with the same material. The change over with the plastic windows to glass had more to do with DOT requirements here in the USA, where the vast majority of SWT's ended up, and most of those ( SWT's ) were sold here in SoCal. As a note , SWT's sent to the USA after January 1, 1968 were not to have rear seats because of DOT safety requirements. The ROW SWT's had seats. Porsche decided that their volume sales market , USA , dictated production choices, hence the glass windows. Turns out the production of Targa's in 1968 with glass windows are truly a more "collectable" Porsche than the SWT's because of super-low production. This is both 911 and 912. Whereas, in 1969, it's inverted the other way because of the DOT standards here in the USA.
    [FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]
    Curt Autenrieth
    S Registry # 152

    Porsches:
    1.6L 2.7L
    1.8L 3.0L
    2.0L 3.2L
    2.2L 3.4L h20 cooled
    2.4L 3.6L air & h20 cooled
    3.8L

  9. #9
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,371

    Roll Call

    Quote Originally Posted by VintageExcellen View Post
    . . . no records were kept by the factory on soft window production . . . I have a 69S SWT for sale this summer that would blow this car away. My guess on production numbers of these cars is in the 10-20 range based on what I have seen in the world, but who knows . . .
    Be great if you can add your car to this listing . . . .

    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ight=roll+call

    One way to nail the number-of-cars down . . .

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  10. #10
    Senior Member VintageExcellen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,945
    Quote Originally Posted by curtisaa View Post
    ...Turns out the production of Targa's in 1968 with glass windows are truly a more "collectable" Porsche than the SWT's because of super-low production.
    Ahh.... but a more collectible item would be based on desirability in my book rather than just rarity, I can speak from experience that a 68 glass window targa is not more desirable in the mass market place than a SWT.


    The car I have is already listed in the roll call post.
    Last edited by VintageExcellen; 03-07-2013 at 09:38 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. FS: @eBay - 1967 Porsche 911S Soft Window Targa
    By 67er911S in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-05-2013, 11:11 PM
  2. FS: @eBay - 1969 Porsche 911S Soft Window Targa
    By METAVINYL in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 01-24-2013, 04:47 PM
  3. 1969 911E Soft Window Targa w/ 2.4 911S MFI
    By Mayos in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-17-2011, 07:44 AM
  4. 1967 911S soft Window Targa on EBay
    By toomany911's in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 04:11 AM
  5. Ebay '67 912 Soft Window Targa
    By RTincher in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-28-2005, 12:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.