Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: FS: @eBay - 71S formely owned by Peter Gregg...another one

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by sithot View Post
    $150 for a P.D.I.? in 1971 dollars that borders on buggery as it would be approximately $865 in todays dollars. Another reference is that a Rolex Stainless Date-Just or Milgauss Rolex were about $250)
    .

    A Nissan pays the dealer 1.3 hours to perform the PDI on a 2013 370Z @ $106.50 an hour totaling $138.45

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by gsjohnson View Post
    .

    A Nissan pays the dealer 1.3 hours to perform the PDI on a 2013 370Z @ $106.50 an hour totaling $138.45
    Seems fair. Wouldn't you agree that modern cars are pretty buttoned down when they leave the factory?

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  3. #23
    Senior Member Per Schroeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Avon Lake, Ohio
    Posts
    272
    Might also be pre-delivery installation for those parts that are all in the same handwritten bracket.
    Per Schroeder

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Per Schroeder View Post
    Might also be pre-delivery installation for those parts that are all in the same handwritten bracket.
    You're probably correct. Typically the PDI is not listed on the Window Sticker or the Dealer Invoice.

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Chester, NJ
    Posts
    48
    A little background.. I was a Porsche Dealer in NJ from 1973 to 2000...and knew Peter. Each year I would take a car and drive it in the summer..when it sold you could always say it was my car/ demo... no dealer I ever knew registered or titled a car/ demo in his name... always drove on dealer plates, no reason to pay registration or sales tax... Peter Gregg drove many new Porsche's as part of being a Porsche Dealer, nothing special...If the car was modified by Brumos to increase it's selling price and Peter drove it , a little different, but again not that special...just a smart marketing tool... Nice to say you own a car that Peter used , but in opinion just a nice story to dine out on.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by autofair View Post
    A little background.. I was a Porsche Dealer in NJ from 1973 to 2000...and knew Peter. Each year I would take a car and drive it in the summer..when it sold you could always say it was my car/ demo... no dealer I ever knew registered or titled a car/ demo in his name... always drove on dealer plates, no reason to pay registration or sales tax... Peter Gregg drove many new Porsche's as part of being a Porsche Dealer, nothing special...If the car was modified by Brumos to increase it's selling price and Peter drove it , a little different, but again not that special...just a smart marketing tool... Nice to say you own a car that Peter used , but in opinion just a nice story to dine out on.
    Thanks for the insight.

    And so it goes.

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    719
    Sold for $60,100. These early S's sure have made a move in recent months.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by rmfent View Post
    Sold for $60,100. These early S's sure have made a move in recent months.
    ??????????

  9. #29
    Senior Member kentf14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Allen Henderson View Post
    ??????????
    Too high or to low?
    Certainly a basket case of a car, but I was expecting more. Don't get me wrong, it was worth a hell of a lot less than the final bid, I was just expecting something SUPER crazy.
    Last edited by kentf14; 04-28-2013 at 06:08 PM.
    E911SR & RGRUPPE
    '65 911 "The Ol' Gal" (long gone)
    '73 S Coupe #306

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by kentf14 View Post
    ??????? Too high or to low?
    Certainly a basket case of a car, but I was expecting more. Don't get me wrong, it was worth a hell of a lot less than the final bid, I was just expecting something SUPER crazy.
    Sorry, actually I was thinking of a different car and post when I posted that. So now I change it to !!!!! OK, if S prices continue to climb, the owner might break-even should he decide to sell in 2016 or so when it's done Thanks.

    -Allen-

Similar Threads

  1. Peter Gregg Cars
    By LongRanger in forum General Info
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-12-2020, 08:20 AM
  2. Peter Gregg Cars
    By Rennman in forum General Info
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-16-2011, 06:50 AM
  3. 73 911 S/RSR built by Peter Gregg
    By philvb in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-17-2007, 06:06 PM
  4. Peter Gregg 911S. Anybody Know About It?
    By J-P in forum General Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-19-2006, 02:09 AM
  5. Peter Gregg--sporto
    By fg1227 in forum General Info
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-17-2005, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.