Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Sam Posey Slams 911, 917, etc.

  1. #1
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780

    Sam Posey Slams 911, 917, etc.

    Bitterness does not fade with age

    Road & Track Guest Column

  2. #2
    Senior Member Peanut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,086
    Wow. Bitter for sure...
    1968 911S
    1986 Carrera
    2006 Carrera S

    1973 BMW 3.0CS - Frances (gone but not forgotten)

  3. #3
    I read that too.

    Darn near the entire issue was "Porsche" related.

    Tom
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  4. #4
    Senior Member mvboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    115
    I thought it was well written. Porsches aren't flawless and the last five parapgraphs were very positive and it sounded like he's come around.

    "Last fall, my son John and I were in the paddock at Lime Rock when we spotted a 911 Turbo S. John doesn't carry the Porsche baggage that I do, and he found the car stunning. To my surprise, I soon agreed with him".


    That sounds like a ringing endorsement to me.
    David

    1972 911T Targa
    1993 964 RSA #14
    Early S Registry #1799
    PAID MEMBER 2016-17

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pine Bush NY
    Posts
    643
    I see this differently...Sam is right (somewhat) His disdain of his own Porsche experience has some valid facts ,
    The early 917s were bad until the long tail and his admitted inability to accept and deal with the 911s handling traits while others won!
    That is racing, coming to terms with the equipment, track and your own ability

    My 2 cents.......
    Ron




    1973.5 911T
    1974 BMW R90/6
    1986 Carrera, Plan "B"
    1987 BMW K100RS Motorsport
    2004 BMW X3 6 speed manual transmisson

  6. #6
    Senior Member Haasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    N.Calif., south of SF
    Posts
    1,967
    911s and their derivatives are horrible cars to drive .... when not setup correctly. I’m wondering how the other drivers would describe their non-winning car's handling?

    These cars, when setup correctly and driven by someone who understands the advantages of rear engine configurations, are masterful and hard to beat: Hard braking means the vehicle center of gravity moves to just in front of center of the four wheels, traction during acceleration is aided by engine/trans mass over driven wheels.

    The 901/911, designed in 1963, was a very versatile and heavily developed platform, a consistent winner across manifold competitive events, spanning decades. Where are/were the other cars today that Mr. Posey raced against, today?

    Sam Posey is respected in many circles. His personal experiences with Porsches are not universal experiences; otherwise the 901/911 platforms would have been discontinued/abandoned years (decades) ago.
    Last edited by Haasman; 05-04-2013 at 08:15 PM.
    Haasman

    Registry #2489
    R Gruppe #722
    65 911 #302580
    70 914-6 #9140431874
    73 911s #9113300709

  7. #7
    Senior Member M_deJong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    DFW TX
    Posts
    681
    Wow, and I used to really enjoy Sam's writing...
    Mike de Jong | '71 911T/E 2.4 Tangerine | '74 911S 3.2 Ice Green

  8. #8
    Member #1722 Nine17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    877
    Mr. Posey (to me, at least) appears to suffer from preppy social-pecking-order baggage resulting from Hutschke von Hanstein's snub at Daytona in '66.

    Probably just my own class-conscious glasses, but back in the day I saw him as a rich kid not quite out of a school blazer, with a rich Mommy buying him rides -- never as a professional. Posey's reminiscence conveniently forgets that one of his best-ever Can-Am finishes was at Laguna in '72 when Mommy rented him Vasek Polak's 3 year-old beater Porsche 917PA.

    Get over it, dude!

  9. #9
    Senior Member CurtEgerer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    5,780
    The main problem I have with the article is he plays the gratuitous 'Nazi card' and describes the rear-engine design as "stupid". It's far from stupid. Different? Yes. And I'll let the 911 and 917 race records stand for themselves. I wonder if Sam has been hanging around with Bobby Unser lately

  10. #10
    Senior Member uptheorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Scarsdale, New York
    Posts
    702
    irregardless of his point of view, it was still fun to read it . . .
    Jim

    __________________________________________________ ___________
    Early S Registry #2359

    1970 Porsche 911 Rally 2.4
    2018 Porsche Macan GTS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.