I got into a discussion with some one about Seinfeld's car 300049. Is it the first 911 or a 901?
John
I got into a discussion with some one about Seinfeld's car 300049. Is it the first 911 or a 901?
John
1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.
Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com
Registry #983
R Gruppe #741
The first 911 was built on november 10 with car number 300049, so yes - he has the first 911, but that does not mean there are no 901's with a higher number. For example, on november 5 1964 two 901-cars were produced with the numbers 300074 and 300079. This is because production in those days was not exactly chronologically (is that an english word?)
Erik
Thanks Erik. So what makes it the first 911 if 901 cars were made after it? Is it that everything made on or after November 10th are 911's. And are '64 MY cars 901's or 911's or does that matter, or is it just the date of November 10th? Just trying to understand.
John
1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.
Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com
Registry #983
R Gruppe #741
Seinfelds #49 was the first '911' after Porsche had to give up '901'.
Like Erik says were cars not produced in sequential order. So despite their higher VIN were they produced before #49 and were they actually 901's
To me personal there are 901's, all 901 cars produced before #49 and there are 64 911s .
Basically the same car, the only difference were they produced before or after Porsche gave up 901.
Just my $.02
Richard
Hello John,
It was just a decision that was taken since Peugeot had the veto on the typenumbers with a zero in the middle. There has never been found an official protest by Peugeot, but it was just decided that all cars produced from November 10th were called 911 instead of 911. So the date is decisive and not a certain production-number. Btw: not one car was officially sold with 901-signs - they all went back to the factory (the few that were sold to factoryworkers etc) and rebadged as 911-cars.
Funny detail: Peugeot didn't have a thing against the 904 presumably, because that one was not rebadges. The fact that this was not a production car was probably reason enough for Peugeot to let this go by - the same goes for the 906, 907, 908 and 909 that followed after that...
(source: Jürgen Lewandowski and sorry for stealing Bob Flemings thunder since this is his territory)
. . . and another 'cluster' . . .
http://forums.motivemag.com/showthread.php?3662909
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum...d.php?t=929590
http://www.atico.nl/camelot/13327.html
Last edited by LongRanger; 06-25-2013 at 08:04 AM.