Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Upper strut mount bushings

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Merv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    781

    Upper strut mount bushings

    While my car is in for stripping and painting, I am ordering a few parts. I need to replace the upper (front) strut mount bushings. The plates, etc., seem fine and I have new Koni inserts ready to go into the strut.

    So, I can see on PP poly bushings and also the Elephant Racing ones. The fright alone is $50 on each. Is there an Australian source for (just) the bushings?
    Merv

    Member # 2633
    Cars:
    Porsche '68 - 911N (Sold)
    Porsche 356B (T-6) S Coupe
    Porsche 2008 C2 997 Cabriolet (Sold)
    Porsche 2010 Gen.2 Boxster S

  2. #2
    Merv,

    The rubber bushes in the 65-69 Camber plates are different to the 1970-89 parts and as far as I know unavailable.

    If the bushes you have are in reasonable shape than I would suggest that you re-use them.

    The Elephant Racing part which is listed as being suitable for 65-89 is, I believe, incorrectly catalogued. This Rubber Bush will not fit your camber plate unless it has previously been changed for one from a later car.

    The Super Pro website (Australian Polybush) lists their part as being 1969-89 but in reality the change occurred in 1970.

    If you have later camber plates or fitted these as complete parts (They are available from Porsche) then you would experience some difficulty in setting sufficient caster when you adjust your suspension.

    The body shell differs slightly in the later cars in terms of the angle of the Macpherson strut mounting and the camber plate has subtly different angles to deal with this change and this affects the degree of camber adjustment when using the later plate in an early shell.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Hi Merv and Chris

    Merv, I responded on the 901 board that I had used the blue poly versions (presumably the Super Pro units). My car is a 69 and I have had no problem setting factory specs for castor and camber on my particular car, though from memory the tech had a few goes at getting it right.

    Given that your car is a 68, Chris' advice might be pertinent...

    Given that I have a 68 and a 69 in my garage, I'll go have a good look and see what the differences are for you.
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

  4. #4
    John,

    When was your 1969 car built? and how much caster are you setting?





    These diagrams show the difference in angles which according to the Workshop Manual took place in 1970.

    The later camber plates have the bush shown below



    The earlier bushes are shown below on and are on the left side.

    The bushes on the right side are standard Koni bushes.




    These are the differences in camber plates between 69 and later cars.

    We have found it difficult to set caster at more the 4.5 degrees with the later plate in the early bodyshell.


  5. #5
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Hi Chris (and Merv)

    I don't have my settings handy, it was set up 'aggressively' for track work at the time with strong negative camber. I've definitely got the 'later' one piece. My T chassis is 0145, so presumably fairly early (August/Sept 68 I think). It's quite possible the plates were changed out by a PO.

    Thanks for the photos of the differences - they are considerable!
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

  6. #6
    Senior Member Fishcop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Port Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    1,782
    Merv, when I got new (NOS) Koni struts for my car, they came with a new set of the bushes shown in the bottom photos from Chris - so maybe you've got the same in the kit and don't need to source new bushes?
    John Forcier
    EarlyS #1987
    1968 911 Race Car "Grun Hilda"
    1969 S/T interpretation "Blau Healer"
    Restoration Saga

Similar Threads

  1. 901 transmission mount bushings ???
    By Greg D. in forum General Info
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-07-2017, 03:26 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-29-2013, 11:48 PM
  3. Where to find transmission mount bushings for '66
    By jaldeguer in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-16-2012, 11:18 PM
  4. FS: Upper strut mount kit
    By 9seriesguy in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 07:32 AM
  5. Upper strut mount bushings
    By mcguillc in forum Technical Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-31-2001, 09:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.