Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Vintage/historic racing qn: 1963 DKW-Porsche TM Special

  1. #1

    Vintage/historic racing qn: 1963 DKW-Porsche TM Special

    http://www.fantasyjunction.com/cars/...t%204-Cylinder

    I was wondering how this car is able to be vintage raced in the USA, given that the current motor was not of the type used in period. Under Australian rules, this car would have to run a 4 cam (or half of one) to get a historic logbook to race against other 1963 period cars (or a 911 motor to run against cars of the later period when that motor was fitted).

    The USA rules are obviously different. Can anyone shed any light?
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Beautiful restoration but are you sure it was raced in its current configuration?

  3. #3
    Frank,

    That was why I asked the question.

    In Australia, that car would not be allowed to race (unless you could prove it ran back in the day in its current spec).

    So how does it get allowed in the USA?
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  4. #4
    Oil Cooled Heart Bullethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,195
    There have been a couple of stories published on this car. It's interesting, but if it were more significant it wouldn't languish at FJ for the past year.

    Naturally, building a cobbled up 2-cylinder 547 as the original builder did is now cost prohibitive... Ryan, are you saying it wouldn't be eligible
    in Australia without that engine? Do all vintage/historic racecars in Australia really have their original engine?

    According to the seller, at different times in it's race history it's run a 2 cyl 800cc four-cam, a pushrod 1600 and a 911 motor.
    Most historic/vintage groups here and in Europe would welcome it in any of those configurations because all are SCCA recorded, logbook existing and original engine(s) or not.
    Russ

    ESR # 1537

    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '67 S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 T Targa Sportomatic
    '68 L SW Targa Sportomatic
    '70 914/6 GT

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Can you image a 911 motor?
    THAT car with any more than 200 hp would be scaaary.
    Needs brakes, tires, and much lower CG.

  6. #6
    Oil Cooled Heart Bullethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,195
    Yeah... and it was autocrossed with a 911 mill. I'd like to see the time sheets.

    The thing's too heavy to be competitive with a 1600, it's most interesting feature was that split 4-cam it once had.
    If it still had that powerplant it would have no trouble selling.
    Russ

    ESR # 1537

    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '67 S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 T Targa Sportomatic
    '68 L SW Targa Sportomatic
    '70 914/6 GT

  7. #7
    I think the issue is that the info from the seller only mentions a half Carrera, a full Carrera, and a 911 motor. No pushrod 4.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  8. #8
    Oil Cooled Heart Bullethead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    2,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Flieger View Post
    I think the issue is that the info from the seller only mentions a half Carrera, a full Carrera, and a 911 motor. No pushrod 4.
    From the Fantasy Junction ad copy:
    Thews then bought a pair of brand-new 1600cc Porsche Type 692 four-cam Carrera engines in Texas.
    My bad... you're absolutely right. I thought for sure I'd read a piece about this car that mentioned an SC motor in it's life but couldn't find referrence anywhere.
    A Typ 692 will about triple the cost of getting this historically correct, so $55K is just the start... can you imagine doing the twin version too?
    Russ

    ESR # 1537

    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '67 S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 T Targa Sportomatic
    '68 L SW Targa Sportomatic
    '70 914/6 GT

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Bullethead View Post
    Naturally, building a cobbled up 2-cylinder 547 as the original builder did is now cost prohibitive... Ryan, are you saying it wouldn't be eligible
    in Australia without that engine? Do all vintage/historic racecars in Australia really have their original engine?
    Hi Russ,

    You must run the original type motor here.

    Back to the original question - is this car eleigble for historic racing in the USA?
    Cheers, Ryan

    Founder and chief centre cap remover at : ZOLLHAUS / Design driven custom PORSCHE : https://zoll.haus

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Absolutely.
    SVRA and HSR would find a group you could run with.

    The tea and crumpet organizations would probably shun it though.

Similar Threads

  1. Vintage 1963 Gillig Porsche Transport Bus Wanna Be
    By porschecab in forum Other Car Cultures
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-12-2014, 08:10 AM
  2. Vintage 1963 Gillig Porsche Transport Bus Wanna Be
    By porschecab in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2014, 08:03 AM
  3. 1963 DKW-Porsche TM Special
    By 72targa in forum For Sale/Wanted: Other Porsche Cars and Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 11:59 AM
  4. Porsche Legal Historic Vintage Racing 2.5L Twin Plug Engine
    By 72targa in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2005, 11:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.